Great idea
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
*** GPU Hierarchy ***
- Thread starter Armageus
- Start date
Interesting idea - when I get some time, I'll have a play about and see what I can do
No this is purely compiled based on gaming performance.
Linux performance should be similar, and you'd expect ai performance to be similar in that more powerful cards should be better at it, but there are a few intricacies that may affect ai, e.g. which Cuda version is supported for Nvidia cards (e.g. old high end cards might not even be able to run it, as don't support a new enough version) and amount of vram (e.g. new low end cards might not have enough vram for the models you require)
Yep that looks great value Vs a 4070 or 4070 Super.
The bundled games are another plus point if your able to resell them
I've no experience with the Xbox side of things (I've got a PS4 and PS5) but the theoretical specs at least list the One X GPU at 6 TFlops Vs only 4 TFlops for the Series S.Was looking at upgrading my nieces Xbox One X to the Series S
But this charts shows the old Xbox One X as being faster then the newer Xbox Series S
Shouldnt the 7900xt be in tier D?
And shouldnt the RX 7900 GRE be in tier E?
From the latest rankings here, that seems pretty clear:
MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Ventus 3X OC Review
NVIDIA has launched the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti today, lifting the review embargo. The MSI RTX 5070 Ti Ventus 3X comes at NVIDIA MSRP of $750, yet includes a small factory overclock. In terms of performance, the Ventus is able to compete with RTX 4080 Super and RX 7900 XTX.www.techpowerup.com
I use several sources to make a decision, and one of the other sources I use still reinforces the position of where they currently are.
The biggest difficulty is that by assigning "tiers" rather than a position on a graph, you inherently have to group cards together. Some of the tiers are particularly odd in that there might be 15% difference between the "top" and "bottom" cards in a tier, but yet they are probably only 2-3% faster or slower than the cards in the next tier up or down... you have to draw a line somewhere.
The 7900XT and 7900GRE probably fall into that trap too, as the 7900XT is definitely the slowest card in Tier C, but probably has enough of a jump over cards in Tier D that it feels wrong to be there.
Personal view is 3-4 tiers if you are somewhere in the middle of the list. If you are nearer the top then 2-3 tiers should be your aim.
The only 1 tier move that really made sense would be from say a 4080 to a 4090, and that was simply because the performance increase from a 4090 was so good there probably should be an empty tier below it
The only 1 tier move that really made sense would be from say a 4080 to a 4090, and that was simply because the performance increase from a 4090 was so good there probably should be an empty tier below it
Nope these are cost optimised replacements for the 7900XT/7900XTX. Aimed at decent mid range performance at a reasonable price.
AMD aren't supposed to have a true high end card this generation.
In all honesty forgot about them as they're so underwhelming
I'll add them when I'm next near a computer
Because they aren't even in the same postcode, let alone ballpark.I don't know why the 5080 is not Tier B, under the 4090
Erm definitely not
That's a more logical suggestion - I will review at some point