graw 2 demo on marketplace!

I quite liked this demo even though I wasn't a huge fan of the original (possibly due to the location style of the game).

I have to say though it can't touch RB6 in terms of the control method (the cover method on Graw is far too clunky). (I found the RB6 control method nigh on perfect for the type of game) however I did manage to 'get' the controls easier than Graw 1 (which is odd considering they are the same, so whether they have tightened them up I don't know)

One thing I did like was the drone in the sky where you could check out what is in front of you.
 
Watched through 4 or so videos there - looking very nice.

Medic... hmmm... who'd want to choose to be a Medic? They'd have to spend the whole game trying to revive Krono! :D
 
$anch3z said:
Its just a polished graw really ....will definately avoid this just seems a total rip off

The next GOW will just be a polished GOW, COD3 is just more COD2. Pro evo6 is just more pro evo5.

A tart up is hardly a rip off.
 
dannyjo22 said:
The next GOW will just be a polished GOW, COD3 is just more COD2. Pro evo6 is just more pro evo5.

A tart up is hardly a rip off.

Exactly you got it in one.

Why should a sequel be something brand new everytime? All sequels are just a polished and more refined game. It doesn't stop games such as Gran Turismo selling in the millions does it? Also don't forget this will be the first Ghost Recon game on PS3 and if it wasn't brought to the X360 people would whine about it and Ubisoft would be missing out on a whole lot of money.

If you mean its not worth £40 I will agree, but its not going to stop me from buying it since its only money and if I enjoy the game its money well spent in my book.
 
kalanium said:
All sequels are just a polished and more refined game.
Fact.

As I have said before, if you want originality and innovation then look for new games rather than sequels.

If a game is considered to be decent in the first place, why would they change too much in the follow up?
 
Back
Top Bottom