GRAW 2 PC delayed / rant

titaniumx3 · 29 Mar 2007 at 16:35

Why not just try it out? If you can afford a top spec PC I'm pretty sure you can dish out for a 360.

Its all about the type of games you play and how you like to play them. For certain games on the PC, even if they were bugged to death I'd still buy and build a rig just to play that game on a PC and nothing else.

Certain aspects of PC gaming simply have no subtitute.

Gerard · 29 Mar 2007 at 16:44

Considering its probably another ubisoft portover which will probably run like ass, no great loss imo.

Hamoodii · 29 Mar 2007 at 17:01

really glad ubisoft have delayed the game

Hayley-K · 29 Mar 2007 at 20:34

Hamoodii said:
really glad ubisoft have delayed the game

Well from every has said I don't care anymore either. It probably would have been a rubbish port as ubi are now famous for that!

I think I will try and get a 360 and play it nicely optimised and stable

stress free

I win yay

Hayley-K · 29 Mar 2007 at 20:35

Hamoodii said:
really glad ubisoft have delayed the game

yay PC loses out on another title :mad:

WOOT

Kmodo · 29 Mar 2007 at 20:37

Hamoodii said:
really glad ubisoft have delayed the game

Well from what every1 has said I don't care anymore either. It probably would have been a rubbish port as ubi are now famous for that!

I think I will try and get a 360 and play it nicely optimised and stable

stress free

Gashman · 29 Mar 2007 at 21:56

right lets get all this stuff straightened out, i am avid ghost recon player, i have all of them, barring GRAW2 and GR2 on PC, there better on PC and always will be, the interface of the PC suits the game better than that joke analog rubbish on the x-box, the graphics on GRAW for the 360 are shoddy to say the least, the tactical display is utterly crap (opposed to the real-time 3D view from above you get on the PC), the AI are utterly retarded on the x-box, yet compitent on the PC, it looks better on the PC, your all talking from your behinds if you say the x-box 360 suffers no slowdown, quake 4, marvel ultimate alliance, RS vegas, all suffer slowdown, halo ran good on the x-box but the interface was crap, pads + FPS just aren't as good as FPS with mice, sorry its true, GRAW2 for the PC will proberbly be released though like the last one it'll have different campaign missions and interface tweaks, that you can't use on the x-box cause of the crappy lack of buttons on pads, plus GRAW was hardly a shoddy port from x-box to PC, its always ran fine for me :confused:

skullman · 29 Mar 2007 at 22:05

Prefer the 360 versions myself, and the graphics are not shoddy at all. I reckon GRAW2 on the 360 is one of the best looking games on the platform so far.

Gashman · 30 Mar 2007 at 00:20

skullman said:
Prefer the 360 versions myself, and the graphics are not shoddy at all. I reckon GRAW2 on the 360 is one of the best looking games on the platform so far.

well i play GRAW with mate on his x-box 360 and the graphics on his HDTV are rubbish compared to GRAW on my PC 16AA and 16AF, theres just no comparison, plus the tactical map on GRAW x-box is unforgivable, it offered no tactical assistance whatsoever?

Kmodo · 30 Mar 2007 at 05:26

graphics on his HDTV are rubbish compared to GRAW on my PC 16AA and 16AF, theres just no comparison

right then would you like to inform me how you got real AA (not that lame in game smudge) working on GRAW :confused:

Cannaton · 30 Mar 2007 at 08:14

Yeah but dude, the graphics on GRAW are bound to be better on a £1200 pc than on a £300 360, Never the less though, some of the multiplayer aspects are superior on the 360. And besides, whoever said AA/AF made a great game?