You really need to take the red tinted glasses off.
His trailing leg? Its trailing because hes playing the ball...unless you normally run like that?
you havent proved anything. You just claimed it hit his trailing leg lmao.
You know the difference between a block and an attempted clearance right? Also yesterday you were adamant it hit his hip, make your mind up.
He’s forgetting Newcastle we’re once part of the big bad 6 back in the ‘I’d love it days’. Now they are we back thanks to some of that oil money.
First replay I seen was this morning.
Is that true?
got a link to the Newcastle one?
yes he did, he moves his leg towards the ball, that's changing body shape. i.e a deliberate attempt to play the ball.
Do you think it was offside yes or no?
So you think both goals should have stood yes?Gary Neville ‘bemused’ that Elliot Anderson’s goal was disallowed
Gary Neville said he was ‘bemused’ that Elliot Anderson’s goal for Newcastle against Nottingham Forest was ruled out for offside. Neville explained that he couldn’t understand why the goal was not given.www.skysports.com
Dermot on Newcastle disallowed goal
"I don't really see why the VAR got involved because, for me, Felipe clearly goes to kick the ball out for a corner. I think Jacob Murphy is behind hin would intercept the ball, he knows that.
"He goes to kick the ball out for a corner Murphy's not in an offside position. So he's quite entitled to be there. He goes kick the ball out for a corner."
The Newcastle goal was more a goal then the Liverpool one was and that for sure.
You can take the subjectivity out of the way by saying any touch off of the defender means it's not offside but you can guarantee that we'll have situations where a player takes a shot, it brushes off a defender and falls to an attacker who was in an offside position. There's no easy solution with every aspect of offside and whatever change you make might solve one issue but will only create new ones.
With done a pretty god job of that already. tbf.
