- Joined
- 29 Nov 2008
- Posts
- 13,340
- Location
- London
That angle can be deceiving if some of the ball is hanging over the line. Regardless, its criminal we still don't have sufficient angles for calls like that.
Its not Joelinton its the ball he cant be ahead of.We've been done by some unbelievable decisions over the past 12 months, but that one takes the entire pack of Hobnobs.
The only question is whether Joelinton played the ball and if Gordon was beyond him.
They need eagle eye for the whole perimeterThat angle can be deceiving if some of the ball is hanging over the line. Regardless, its criminal we still don't have sufficient angles for calls like that.
That was my meaning - was Gordon ahead of the ball when Joelinton played it.Its not Joelinton its the ball he cant be ahead of.
VAR misguided the game a lot more than the ref. He did well when surrounded by clowns for a normal foulThe ref and VAR overall have been a disgrace.