Caporegime
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2010
- Posts
- 53,734
- Location
- Welling, London
Can’t agree. He looked at full stretch. Just too accurate.And that's the end of any chances, de Gea with **** keeping, he should be saving that
Can’t agree. He looked at full stretch. Just too accurate.And that's the end of any chances, de Gea with **** keeping, he should be saving that
Sane doesn't get in this team ahead of their front three though and you wouldn't drop Silva, De Bruyne or Fernandinho to accommodate him. Exceptional player but City have got 6 players better than him.Ah no, Sane coming on is real bad, don’t know how they don’t fit him in
There’s always next year.
I’m not even mad about Lingard missing as I unfortunately want City to win tonight.
But I hope him and Rashford are sold in the summer. They are both useless. Rashford has a spell of 2-3 good games once in a while and people in this country lose their minds and act like he’s amazing because he’s young and English. Lingard is just awful full stop, sure he scores a few goals, but that will happen with any player. Throw enough **** and some will stick
That's harsh on Rashford, he's far from the finished article and may never be amazing, but he's shown more than enough in general. One of the best young players around.
Game over.
Sane doesn't get in this team ahead of their front three though and you wouldn't drop Silva, De Bruyne or Fernandinho to accommodate him. Exceptional player but City have got 6 players better than him.
I think rashford needs playing in one position ànd keep playing him there not 2 or 3 positionsI just don’t see it. He’s far too inconsistent and wasteful. His speciality is using his pace to run in to dead ends.
I’d love him to come good but I think he’d be further along than he is now if he was to amount to something more.