He completely absolves himself of blame, the stuff like we got together and talked about it and all the players said they understood what was required of them... so it's the players fault for not doing it.
Yes, presuming you gave perfect instructions and ran great training sessions, but if your tactics and ideas were completely rubbish, the players understanding what you've asked of them doesn't make the players completely to blame.
Players and manager at fault, but considering the managers entire concept of winning appears to be if he had 11 local lads playing they'd win because attitude is all that matters.... I suspect Carver is as tactically inept and useless as he appears to be.
Also the question is, if he knows the players, knows they've lost 7 in a row and knows which players aren't playing 'hard' enough or showing the right type of attitude.... if his tactical and man management awareness is so brilliant how did the same players who didn't want to play start yet another match? if WIlliamson has been dire in the previous 7 losses and according to him maybe wanted to get sent off, how as a manager did he not see this bad attitude in the previous games and play anyone else in his position? Apparently Colback could play in there and be brilliant.