Since when does history dictate who is the underdog?
I would guess that manyoo will be the underdogs this coming season - as I expect that City will be favourites for the title. Might be wrong, but even if I am it will be very close..
Given how successful Utd have been over the EPL era so far, I think "history" dictates a lot
If we were comparing Blackburn to City.....or even Chelsea or Arsenal, then it would be fair to say they are the under dogs currently.
60% of the EPL titles have gone to one team (and evenly spread into the bargain) , so one title means squat in comparison.
Chelsea have proved that having endless amounts of cash available doesnt always mean the be-all and end -all
Considering that he's done very little wrong on the face of it, and his performances either side of him being away from the game, I'd expect most teams would start him in front of all but the very best strikers.
I think majority of fans (whether City or not) would disagree on that considering what happened during the early /mid part of the season and how he acted during it
Not wanting to cause a reaction, a genuine question, is it just sour grapes? It's obvious he's not actually willing death upon his former manager, what's the actual problem?
Every one of the Utd fans (as far as I recall) who has posted here today (and many others) said "well done" to City last Sunday in this thread - so no I dont believe its "sour grapes"
ExactlyThe fact Man City were so fast to issue a sincere apology says it all really.
Last edited: