‘Groundbreaking’ flights six-times faster than speed of sound one step closer..

Imagine teleportation exists, you still get jet lag, but you can sleep in your own bed the night before to help mitigate it. So I don’t see the difference here between in your own bed or on the plane.

Personally I tend to land then stay up and go to bed first night super tired and if I get like 10hrs sleep then I’m fine the rest of the trip.
aye but imagine if it took a year to get there, you wouldn't notice the time difference then :D
 
Actually I'm even more wrong, haha. It depends on direction.

Flying westwards for the same number of hours as the time difference, not jetlag.

Flying eastwards will still mess you up.

Leave Miami at 10am local (so already 3pm in the UK), fly for 5 hours. Now your circadian rhythm thinks it is 3pm as per Miami time, but it is 8pm in the UK, getting to sleep isn't going to be fun.

Ok stop it. My brain is bleeding! :cry:
 
Actually I'm even more wrong, haha. It depends on direction.

Flying westwards for the same number of hours as the time difference, not jetlag.

Flying eastwards will still mess you up.

Leave Miami at 10am local (so already 3pm in the UK), fly for 5 hours. Now your circadian rhythm thinks it is 3pm as per Miami time, but it is 8pm in the UK, getting to sleep isn't going to be fun.

That makes no sense.

Fly from Tokyo to London, it used to be like a 12hr flight before the war, time difference 7hrs. So you only “use” 5hrs, meaning get on the plane at midday and you can land at 5pm.

But your body won’t think it’s 5pm, it will think it’s midnight because you spent 12hrs getting there. Time passes by the same (let’s not go into time differs due to gravitational force, interstellar style topic).
 
Last edited:
That makes no sense.

Fly from Tokyo to London, it used to be like a 12hr flight before the war, time difference 7hrs. So you only “use” 5hrs, meaning get on the plane at midday and you can land at 5pm.

But your body won’t think it’s 5pm, it will think it’s midnight because you spent 12hrs getting there. Time passes by the same (let’s not go into time differs due to gravitational force, interstellar style topic).
You're right, my brain can't math on the weekend it seems.

If you fly for 5 hours and travel 5 timezones, you effectively freeze time, even though your brain will still have experienced 5 hours of time progression.
 
Last edited:
Going upto Mach 6 isn't that going to be a strain, and it would have to be pretty verticle too... No?

Lol


Things are better faster :)

Alsong as it was safe. I would really want a go on one


This is probably a long way off though , and probably expensive that your traditional flight.
 
Last edited:
Impressive although we're a long, long way from seeing it implemented on a commercial aircraft. There's more chance of it ending up on military applications if it works though.

There's already a company trying to do Concorde II, the unfortunately named Boom Supersonic (https://boomsupersonic.com/).
...
I think it's been at least five years since they started making announcements, and they're still working on testing a prototype smaller plane.

Hopefully their research with the XB-1 around reducing sonic booms allows them to develop a passenger aircraft; it certainly would be nice to see a commercial, and ultimately viable, supersonic aircraft again.
 
I suffered no jet lag whatsoever flying to NY. You effectively arrive the same time as you left, give or take. So you just have a longer day, feel nice and tired, get a long sleep on the first night and you're fine.

Coming back west to east is a different issue. In the states they call it the Red Eye. My flight from NY was early evening NY time. I arrived in the UK 6.5 hrs later and was walking around London looking for a fry-up at 9am. Got home having been awake 20+ hours and it was midday. Very odd feeling.
 
I suffered no jet lag whatsoever flying to NY. You effectively arrive the same time as you left, give or take. So you just have a longer day, feel nice and tired, get a long sleep on the first night and you're fine.

Coming back west to east is a different issue. In the states they call it the Red Eye. My flight from NY was early evening NY time. I arrived in the UK 6.5 hrs later and was walking around London looking for a fry-up at 9am. Got home having been awake 20+ hours and it was midday. Very odd feeling.

I wake up at 4am most days for work but on my off day I will normally get up between 6 and 7. A 5 hour difference is not that bad and you will easily adapt.

When I went to Australia I was awake for around 40 hours in total and slept for 10 hours on my first night but was fine after that. Don't think I could manage that at this age though.
 
I suffered no jet lag whatsoever flying to NY. You effectively arrive the same time as you left, give or take. So you just have a longer day, feel nice and tired, get a long sleep on the first night and you're fine.

Coming back west to east is a different issue. In the states they call it the Red Eye. My flight from NY was early evening NY time. I arrived in the UK 6.5 hrs later and was walking around London looking for a fry-up at 9am. Got home having been awake 20+ hours and it was midday. Very odd feeling.
Yep it's been scientifically proven that going east (jumping ahead) 6-9 hours is the absolute worst on the body. I remember flying to Japan - left Amsterdam at around 2pm, landed at around 9am Japan time which by then was 1am body time but still had a full day ahead of me. Awful.
 
Wish my wife would agree....


That said I'd love for a flight to be shorter. Hate being on a plane only for the reason they're too small and uncomfortable.


:D had to laugh at this


But yeh i know what you mean, luckily the last flight i had a few weeks back i was by the emergency door, so extra leg room on the return flight back.

Not quite business class though
 
Back
Top Bottom