Soldato
I'd much rather it was tit for tit. #JustSayin
Always lowering the tone .
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I'd much rather it was tit for tit. #JustSayin
Yeah. The only criticism (and it's an old one so I apologise in advance) is the ruddy cooler they shipped them with .
The charts could have looked a lot better for AMD with a better cooling solution. Obviously custom coolers have completely changed that but unfortunately doesn't change a lot of the day 1 reviews which are there when you google for a 290/X review.
No argument from me, those reference coolerscouldshould have been better. they are a big mistake.
No argument from me, those reference coolerscouldshould have been better. they are a big mistake.
Rusty's first post in this thread was to deride the work Rtsurfer and Face2Face did because it wasn't top vs top tier. Completely missing the point they guys could only test what they had available.
Lol i hope that's sarcasm judging by how close the 290X and 780TI are in that video.. 290 cards have had a nice performance boost in Crysis 3 since that video as well.
Really?
All three cards in that video seem to be within 5-10% of each other, I'd rather put the £150 towards a second card or a nice monitor.
Each to their own I guess.
Hang on one sec whilst I just bench my 780 v's my 7970, its what i have available
Some very nice scores there. Pretty much shows that anything over R9 290 will give similar performance. You need to have an FPS display in the corner of your screen to see the difference.
It has always been this way in GPUs though. The law of diminishing returns for you money, that's why the majority aim for a good price/perf ratio. For me the R9 290 and GTX780 are right at the sweetspot, with the R9 290 coming out slightly ahead.
Posted this in another thread,my 2 cents
Well I can tell you I Ran 780TI SLI ,moved to R9 290 non-x Crossfire and I am perfectly happy.Also had R9 290X crossfire more of the same,sold 290x
For me all drivers have been great with Crossfire.No complaints.
Far as FPS gaming wise 780TI SLI and R9 290 crossfire I could not tell the difference in gameplay.
Far as benching goes they trade blows on the same machine.
EG:Valley run
R9 290 non-x crossfire and 780Ti SLI.
You should add those scores to the Valley leaderboard with a screenshot, would put your setup in the top 15 so others can see the benefit of x fire 290's.
Posted this in another thread,my 2 cents
Well I can tell you I Ran 780TI SLI ,moved to R9 290 non-x Crossfire and I am perfectly happy.Also had R9 290X crossfire more of the same,sold 290x
For me all drivers have been great with Crossfire.No complaints.
Far as FPS gaming wise 780TI SLI and R9 290 crossfire I could not tell the difference in gameplay.
Far as benching goes they trade blows on the same machine.
EG:Valley run
R9 290 non-x crossfire and 780Ti SLI.
R9 290 Single
AMD Radeon R9 290 video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3770K Processor,MSI Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751)
780Ti single
MSI 780Ti video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3770K Processor,MSI Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751)
R9 290 Crossfire run.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2833578
780Ti Sli run
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/1809031
I would be nice if there was a R9 290X2 at £650-700.
lol brilliant. I couldn't give a monkeys if nVidia lost at something. Don't confuse me with Gregster .
Thanks for posting.
What was your single non x 290 clocked at to get 11156 in firestrike and what overclock did you have on cpu?
Sorry should have posted the actual clocks on the cards 3d Mark does not always get it correct,I will put it in the post.
R9 290 clock
1200/1600
780Ti's
Boost clocks
1219/3549
Thanks. What's your cpu clocked to and how may volts extra did you need to reach 1200/1600?