hmmm.... ok
well as you can see i dont really post much, im a bit of a troll to be honest

, but i too own a Honda Accord Type-R, Hell i have two of them as me and my GF both have one, ( abit inpratical i know but its only money

), now im not here to defend Skywalker just voice my opinion,
The ATR i feel is a great car you get a lot of bang for your buck and they are getting rearer by the day, there are currently only about 1300 left in the UK alone ( this fiigure was sorced from the DVLA about 2 years ago so it will be less ), would i compaire this car to an M3, NO!!!!!! in a straight line the M3 would p!ss all over the ATR, but round a track i feel that the ATR would give the M3 a good match. as i have seen ATR's give 300 bhp Evo 5's a run for there money ( last years japfest which i attened and tracked on that day ).
would i compaire the ATR to a st220 or an vectra hmmm... in the essence of there all 4 door, big cars then yes, but if its fun you want then the ATR has my vote, the ATR is a under rated and under estermated car, the ATR will do 0-60 in around 6 seconds ( if you want the vid to prove it i can post it), i would have an ATR over qite a few cars even the new ones but thats just me i love the ATR's Hi Reving Engine, and i have driven quite a few cars including the st220, and the ATR feels more confident to drive, when i drive the ATR i put 100% into it and she never fails me, when i drove the st220 she felt heavy and abit lardy.
as regards to Sky's 235bhp claims they are true ( i was at the dyno ), my ATR pushes 199.7 BHP ( with a few mods ) at the wheels so at the fly thats about 230 ish at the fly with 17% for transmation give or take.
but back to this league topic, i feel the ATR is not in the same league as the ST220, and the vectra but thats just my opinion i would rate it above them because of the handling and the drive and of couse they would be under the M3, EVO's and scoobys as i feel the next stage up from an ATR is a Evo or scooby.

thats my opinon