dokko said:Top Gear can suvive without crazy stunts, tbh, this stunt when i would have seen it on the programme would have been good, but i wouldn't be missing out if they never did it.
The chemistry of the 3 presenters is where its at. They can still test drive cars, race round tracks and do stuff like buy an italian supercar under £10k and get it through slough, without endangering lives.
It cant and wont be cancelled, the BBC want their head read if they even think about it. It will be more popular than ever, as you know everyone will want to see the return of the hamster, in whatever capacity.
Frank Williams (even though i dont like the man) was crippled by a car, but it didn't supress his passion for owning his own F1 team. The hamster will never lose his passion for cars, he might be more cautious in the future, but he'd be gutted to think Top Gear would cease due to an accident he was involved in.
Long live the hamster, and her's hoping he's back in action very soon.
Its not just about the stunts though, i wouldnt call turning a car into a boat a stunt, would you?? I wouldnt call racing a ferrari & a plane to southern europe a stunt would you??
Its not all about stunts, but personally if all that comprised of top gear was 3 presenters reviewing some old car like they used to, i wouldnt watch it. It didnt interest me because it wasnt fun, it made cars seem boring and mundane.
This style makes cars seem fun.