I think this will go around in circles and isn't adding very much to the thread, I've said what I wanted to about the unlikely notion of sacking someone after they've handed in their notice in order to somehow save money and the rather silly/naive reasons presented where money is supposedly saved... I think the posts are clear enough so I'll leave it at that thanks - ironically, as I mentioned before I'm not looking for an argument but it is pretty clear now that you're quite keen to have one despite having quite a weak position to defend ergo, I'm out.
Handed notice in, not accepted
- Thread starter Shoza
- Start date
- Status
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 12,310
Well that's one way to bow out disgracefully, I suppose...
I wasn't looking for an argument either, but it was quite clear that you were indeed interested in hammering your mere opinion into one despite having nothing better to argue with... because I wasn't taking a position in the first place. I made a point, that was all. You failed to understand the point and then decided you wanted to argue over it.
Soldato
Finally!
*grabs popcorn*
am I too late?
*grabs popcorn*
am I too late?
Soldato
Who was he arguing with? I've blocked some people on here and might be one of them as I can't see any "other side" replies
Ttaskmaster and Dowie.
Soldato
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 12,310
It's still part of GD, though, so even a passing remark can end up in WW3...!
Yeah, me an' 'im, so probably not missing anything....
- Status