Nope but you're the one whose main contributions recently have been nothing but complaining about other posters in GD.
It's nice of you to notice
![Smile :) :)](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/smile.gif)
Nope but you're the one whose main contributions recently have been nothing but complaining about other posters in GD.
Realistically you can’t execute every petty criminal so let’s say you double every sentence this massively increases the prison population and the cost of running the service. You may as you say see a reduction in offences initially but eventually you have to release them so long term you will see a return to Similar crime levels unless you actually target the causes of crime and use prison for rehabilitation. The countries in the developed world with the lowest crime rates are not those with the biggest prison populations.Well that's a silly statement.
In the UK I believe the 1 year reoffending rate is about 40%.
If we let those people locked up or executed them then that would evidently prevent them from reoffending.
Realistically you can’t execute every petty criminal so let’s say you double every sentence this massively increases the prison population and the cost of running the service. You may as you say see a reduction in offences initially but eventually you have to release them so long term you will see a return to Similar crime levels unless you actually target the causes of crime and use prison for rehabilitation. The countries in the developed world with the lowest crime rates are not those with the biggest prison populations.
My first post on this forum.We're a nation dominated by fear to the point of suppression and ruled by a group of people who have almost singlehandedly removed the hope and aspersions of an entire generation. We aren't a healthy nation and I don't think the social state is particularly surprising tbh.
Find one but if decent research that supports harsh sentences as a way to reduce crime….. if it worked the US wouldn’t have one of the largest prison populations in the world with an incredibly high rate of re-offending!That's true, but can it definitely be stated that its because of low crime rates that they have the lowest prison populations and vice versa? Recording of crimes is done differently throughout the world, as are classifications of what are even crimes. The US prosecutes for crossing the road in the incorrect place ffs! Sweden is renowned for its lenient treatment and classification of sex crimes on the other side of the scale.
When did we become a nation of wets?
What on earth will happen if we are ever tested as a nation again?
Find one but if decent research that supports harsh sentences as a way to reduce crime….. if it worked the US wouldn’t have one of the largest prison populations in the world with an incredibly high rate of re-offending!
Hard times create strong men,
Strong men create good times,
Good times create weak men,
Weak men create hard times. <<< you are here.
Find one but if decent research that supports harsh sentences as a way to reduce crime….. if it worked the US wouldn’t have one of the largest prison populations in the world with an incredibly high rate of re-offending!
Only if I have too much booze and your mum isn't available to fluff me.
Are you 14?
Yet we've seen massive increases in suicides and mental health issues. We're certainly not all getting by.
The number of suicides in April-October 2020, after the first lockdown began, was 121•3 per month, compared to 125•7 per month in January-March 2020 (-4%; 95% CI-19% to 13%, p = 0•59). Incidence rate ratios did not show a significant rise in individual months after lockdown began and were not raised during the 2-month lockdown period April-May 2020 (IRR: 1•01 [0•81–1•25]) or the 5-month period after the easing of lockdown, June-October 2020 (0•94 [0•81–1•09]). Comparison of the suicide rates after lockdown began in 2020 for the same months in selected areas in 2019 showed no difference.
When did we become a nation of wets?
What on earth will happen if we are ever tested as a nation again?
Which have occured before in other times of trouble. There may well have been fewer suicides in the past because of the previous power of Christianity. Also, have suicide rates actually increased due to the pandemic? The latest I could find with a quick look was a bit in The Lancet.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(21)00087-9/fulltext
As for mental health issues, any apparent increase in modern times could easily be explained by an increase in diagnosis. Even major mental health issues caused by war weren't really recognised until WW2 (there was some talk of "shell shock" before then, but soldiers were still being executed for mental health issues) and even then only amongst combatants even though civilians were very widely affected by that war. Random example - my mother had PTSD after WW2. And yes, I do know what PTSD is and I do mean PTSD. I'm not making a silly exaggeration like calling a cold "flu" or a mild preference for order "OCD". I'm talking about flashbacks, mindless fear and panic, the whole nine yards. She was a child and a civilian with no active role in the war, but the war came to her as it did to many other civilians. Like almost everyone else affected that way, she wasn't diagnosed. Any stats on mental health issues as a result of WW2 would be massively under-reporting them.
My guess is that the situation would be roughly the same as it has been in the past - some people thrive on it, most people endure it, some people break under it.
Some years ago, I was talking with a WW2 veteran. I was somewhat younger then, young enough to have been drafted in a war. I said that I wasn't sure I or people in general could have risen to the occasion as his generation had. He said that they hadn't been sure either.
You can't know, not really know, how you'll act under pressure until you're under that pressure. We're "a nation of wets" because we have the luxury of being able to be.
Are you dead inside?Are you 14?
Yes and it's not helped by censorship of anyone's views that aren't insipid enough not to cause some offence.