Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Feb 2010
- Posts
- 14,583
I've checked out some game footage and the system requirement of Global Agenda. After reading your descriptions and the following:HEY HEY HEY!!! Guys you are really over-estimating my system!!!! High resolution ??? What is that? If I had noticed any improvement of performance with 800x600 I would be playing with that.
I am playing Global Agenda at the second lowest resolution, (probably 1200x ???) with all graphic sets off (no aa,no shadows, low textures) and hitting (in a good day an an empty room) 20-30 FPS.
http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1114853
I'm even more convinced that your 4600+ is dragging your feet much more so than your 8800GTX (if there's even the case at all).
The recommended system requirement of Global Agenda is Dual-core 2.4Ghz
, which your Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (2.4Ghz) meet...just barely. Although it meets it, it is definitely slowing you down in game. One of the guys on that forum mention lots of people can run "1920x1200 at unflinching 60 fps"...just gonna quote what he said to a guy with Amd Athlon 64 X2 Duel Core Processor 5400+(2.80ghz)
4gb Memory, NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO(768mb GDDR2) here:
"You may want to graduate to a video card in the GTX series. Myself and many users seem to enjoy blazing (graphical) performance in the game on cards from this series. To add additional context, I'm talking about users of GTX 260, 280, and 275 playing in typical post-HD resolutions like 1920x1200 at unflinching 60 fps (or 65-ish reported in the case of a fellow using a 120Hz monitor).
I get unfailing 50-60 FPS myself with 2 'older' GTX 260 paired in SLI. Max quality settings + AA (no Depth of Field, not a fan of distance blur) at 19 x 12. With a mildly overclocked E8500 and 4 GB ram. Games like Shattered Horizon look very sexy on this rig too. And MW2 is obviously 60 FPS to the floor, maxed + AA, everywhere/anywhere."- R-Gunthak
It is clear that the game is nowhere near as graphic demanding as Crysis, since even i5 750 overclocked to 4.15Ghz, with HD5870 and 4GB Corsair 1,600Mhz DDR3 ram only manage to run Crysis (DirectX 10, 64-Bit, High) at 1,680x1,050 at only 33-57fps (source: Custom PC Issue 078 March 2010, p41)
I'll give another example of the significant of CPU speed in relating to fps for games.
HD5870, 4GB Corsair 800Mhz DDR2, 4GB Corsair 1,600Mhz DDR3
Crysis (DirectX 10, 64-Bit, High) at 1,680x1,050
[email protected] (stock speed)=12-35fps
Q6600 [email protected]=24-45fps
[email protected] (stock speed)=19-36fps
E8400 [email protected]=27-48fps
Phenom II X4 965 BE (C3 stepping) @3.4Ghz (stock speed)=23-46fps
Phenom II X4 965 BE (C3 stepping) [email protected] =29-52fps
Core i5 [email protected] (stock speed)=20-50fps
Core i5 750 [email protected]
(source: Custom PC Issue 078 March 2010, p41)
So take the Q6600 and E8400 (stock speed) for example, not even the 5870 can provide a smooth playable frame rate (Custom PC uses 25fps for minimum frame rate as their standard of 'playable' for Crysis) at the said settings. However with the CPUs overclocked to higher frequencies, the minimum frame rate boost to 24fps and 27fps, and the maximum frame rate boosted by around 10-12fps.
I really think now would be a good time to upgrade your CPU and motherboard. As for graphic card upgrade, you can either get 5850 now, or wait for nvidia's Fermi to arrive in a few months and let nvidia and ATI fight it out to get a better pricing and better range of choice for the card.
Last edited: