How about we pick an example which isn't entirely misleading? And actually bares some resemblance to the OP's problem. Try this one: you're going to toss two coins and see whether either of them come up tails. This is much closer to the original question because it's asking for one or more, rather than all of.
See end of this post please. I think you got it wrong and I also want to highlight that your post comes across impolite.
Multiplying the chances is absolute mathematical garbage akin to trying to work out 3+6 by appending the digits to get 36.
Yes, that's entirely correct. It's absolutely nothing to do with the problem you've been asked to solve though.
So which one is it? is it mathematical garbage or is it entirely correct? Multiplying and adding probabilities is the cornerstone of probability theory, not something I made up.
(edit) What you've actually worked out is the a priori probability that both will fall in any given month without knowing what happened in all the other months; which is clearly different from what is asked.
Which is what the OP asked, quoting from his "clarification post":
Therefore I am trying to find out what the chance is that any one of the 7 important months coincides with one of the 4 important events.
If that isn't asking for the probability of two events coinciding out of the same sample then I don't know what is.
 
	 
  
 
		