She's disputing liability. Awesome!
£25 and I'm your witness.
I don't actually understand why she would say your indicator was on.
And, in fact - so what if it was? So f'in what? That makes it ok to turn in front of you does it?
WTF. I'm totally confused as to how this is some kind of way out.
[TW]Fox;12972400 said:If you were indicating, perhaps without realising, it might explain why she pulled out. Still dont see how it makes it your fault though?
[TW]Fox;12972457 said:Damn straight you do - if that offer goes through, her insurers will pay 66% of the claim and yours will pay 33% - so it'll go down as a claim against you.
[TW]Fox;12972663 said:If you stick to your story that the indicator was on for a few seconds following its legitimate use as you joined the road further up from the scene of the accident I cannot see how a judge can find it anything but in your favour.
This is a mess and you should have just claimed for the write off from your own Comp (?) policy and done the arguments over liability at a later date.
Even if you did turn left, she should have waited and followed you down the road - sounds like she was in a rush and tried to beat you to the M40
. If the insurance company does not pay out the full amount i could potentially be liable. They have assured me that they won’t pursue me personally for any monies but they will not confirm this in writing.