Heroes

jdderbys said:
Been looking forward to it since the end of season 1.
See, while I don't share the enthusiasm of a lot of people on here, heroes spanks almost every other show currently being produced. Plus my gf loves it so I get bonus points for letting her watch it ;)
 
It's fantastic, especially at the end when saDvwed wertgb wr reth rbet debh hneth b.....


[didn't think I'd really tell you, do you? :))


No, really, it's a fantastic series - takes a few episodes for the story to really get moving, but well worth the wait. If you miss even one episode, the rest of the story won't make sense ;)
 
I tried 24. Couldn't get into it. Wasn't that interested in Lost either. But I was hooked on Heroes from the start. Saw the whole series on Sci-fi but will be watching again on the BBC. Roll on series 2!
 
phoenix said:
I thought it was really good. Cant wait to see the rest of the series.

i agree, another 20ish weeks left & if every episode ends on a cliff hanger i don't thinkg i'll be able to take it the suspence for much longer (wedn'esday's come round 2 slowly
 
Kreeeee said:
It's sick to find her sexually attractive imo as she looks like a kid.
It's not sick at all. She's clearly not a child. You just like to judge people.
 
Psyk said:
It's not sick at all. She's clearly not a child. You just like to judge people.
Yup, I'm 21 and I don't think thay Hayden Panettiere looks "like a kid" whatsoever.

I'd definitely hit it, even if she wasn't famous.
 
I'm watching it again, on the Beeb. I noticed quite a few cuts have been made - mostly dialogue that has been trimmed out, some of which made the scene changes quite jarring. It looks like a couple of minutes have been pruned from each episode to cram them into a 40 minute slot.

The bits that stick in mind are the omission of Claire's "I walked through fire and didn't get burned" interlude and the truncated scene with Hiro and Ando in the bar.

If the Beeb are going to promote a show so much, why not leave it intact?
 
malfunkshun said:
D.o.B is 21/8/89 So she was probably 16 when she started filming Heroes and isnt 18 yet.........

That doesn't mean that physically she's a child.

Unfortunately some people seem to believe the legal age of consent has something to do with defining what a child and paedophilia are.
 
malfunkshun said:
Some girls far younger than 16 aren't physically children, but they are still children.

Indeed they are, but given that we're talking about physical attraction (seeing as none of us know what she's like as a person), then physical traits are what matters ;)
 
Dolph said:
Indeed they are, but given that we're talking about physical attraction (seeing as none of us know what she's like as a person), then physical traits are what matters ;)
Fair enough, but it is my opinion that at less than 18, whether phsyically mature or not, a person is still a child. As such I, personally, cannot find any justification in finding a child physically attractive nor in the activities that would imply.
 
malfunkshun said:
Fair enough, but it is my opinion that at less than 18, whether phsyically mature or not, a person is still a child. As such I, personally, cannot find any justification in finding a child physically attractive nor in the activities that would imply.

Even though the age of consent is 16?

What makes someone aged 17 and 364 days different from someone aged 18?
 
Back
Top Bottom