Heroes

malfunkshun said:
Fair enough, but it is my opinion that at less than 18, whether phsyically mature or not, a person is still a child. As such I, personally, cannot find any justification in finding a child physically attractive nor in the activities that would imply.
I'll just have to cut my balls off then. Can't really help a completely natural and normal physical attraction. You can't just purposefully stop finding someone attractive because you know it would be innapropriate to actually do anything with them.

Anyway, not only is she legal, she doesn't even break the age/2 + 7 rule for me :p
 
Dolph said:
Even though the age of consent is 16?

What makes someone aged 17 and 364 days different from someone aged 18?

Not a law I made, nor one I subscribe to. In my opinion sexual consent for 16-17 year olds should only be applicable between 16-17 year olds.
The difference a day makes is, of course, only a matter of law. Though commonly such law tends to lend itself to being the basis for moral application.

Edit; sorry Psyk, thought you were older lol. I only really have issues with older people (actually older men and under 18s....old-fashioned? :( )
 
Last edited:
malfunkshun said:
Not a law I made, nor one I subscribe to. In my opinion sexual consent for 16-17 year olds should only be applicable between 16-17 year olds.
The difference a day makes is, of course, only a matter of law. Though commonly such law tends to lend itself to being the basis for moral application.

Edit; sorry Psyk, thought you were older lol. I only really have issues with older people (actually older men and under 18s....old-fashioned? :( )

Just to clarify, the fact that she's stunning doesn't mean she's obtainable. In fact, it's probably the opposite. Part of the reason many people think of her as they do is because she's unobtainable, hence she's also 'safe'. There's never any harm in thought, only in action.
 
malfunkshun said:
Edit; sorry Psyk, thought you were older lol. I only really have issues with older people (actually older men and under 18s....old-fashioned? :( )
That's ok. Kreeeee said she looks like a child, but hey, I look like a child too so it'd be a perfect match :D
 
Troop said:
Is series 1 out to buy ?, cant do all that weekly waiting **** :D

.


I'd fully star the swearie, and it's not out until next month I believe.

Oh and only on Overclockers can a thread about a TV series descend into a discussion about having sex with 17 year olds.

*Don't quote it then!*
 
Dolph said:
Just to clarify, the fact that she's stunning doesn't mean she's obtainable. In fact, it's probably the opposite. Part of the reason many people think of her as they do is because she's unobtainable, hence she's also 'safe'. There's never any harm in thought, only in action.
lol, to be honest I dont think she is a particularly good looking child tbh :p
Now, Ali Larter I could have fun with :o
 
Memphis said:
I'd fully star the swearie, and it's not out until next month I believe.

Oh and only on Overclockers can a thread about a TV series descend into a discussion about having sex with 17 year olds.


Done :) all I need now is for you to edit your quote, lol ;)
 
Love the series myself, watched them on the Sci Fi channel but im sorry that Hayden whatever her name is...just doesnt do it for me...i dont think shes anything special but then me being 34 yrs old would say that:p...shes nice looking ill admit but i wouldnt even think of her as being fit...ill leave that to the pre-pubescent ocuk geeks here to fap away at her:p.

Now Ali Larter is a fine specimen of the female species :cool: ...she is damn hot and id give my right and left hand to have my wicked way with her....cracking body on her and isnt bad looking. I wouldnt say no to her thats for sure.

Cant wait for the second series although i thought the way the first series ended wasnt all that tbh. Was expecting a bit more but was kinda disappointed tbh.
 
Awesome show, really got into it on Sci-Fi until got hacked off at having to wait a week for the next instalment so stopped watching it. Waiting for the box set in October now instead so I can watch the whole season uninterrupted :)

Memphis said:
Oh and only on Overclockers can a thread about a TV series descend into a discussion about having sex with 17 year olds.

HAHA cant say I'm surprised though, no thread about Heroes would be complete without the essential reference to Miss Panettiere. Just to clarify is it ok to find her awesomely hot? :confused: :p
 
Hmm, well I steered clear of it whilst on Sky purely as friends told me it was **** with some terrible acting. By pure chance turned over to BB2 tonight and caught the tail end of 1st episode unaware of what i was watching at first. Does seem quite good (albeit some seriously cheesy acting) might watch next weeks and see if i can get into it.
 
Toekiller said:
Just did an 8 hour stretch. Had 10 or so episodes Sky plussed. Once you start...

Anyway all I'll say is... :eek: :) :confused:

Lol, thought it had only just started in the UK? I wouldn't know because.. erm.. doesn't matter... ;)

EDIT: Oh, yea. Sci Fi channel :o
 
I put off watching heroes initially because i was already trying to watch too many shows at once. Then i made the mistake of watching the first episode at 3am at a mates house, we then proceeded to watch 10 episodes in a row without a pause :eek: :D :D
 
Back
Top Bottom