Its the online shopping these days that has taken a big hit on these stores unfortunately.
No, because you don't really shop for albums anymore. Services (spotify mainly) have been a big hit to these types of stores.
How come none of these large companies seem to own the buildings they use? Wouldn't it make sense long term instead of renting them? Surely the monthly mortgage payments would be about the same.
For how long this time?
A lot used to, then the "must improve shareholder payouts before everything else, so I get a bigger bonus" management era came in and they often split off the buildings into their own separate company (or subsiduary) where the main company paid them rent, or simply sold off the property for short term profits, at least for a lot of the older companies (Woolies did exactly this), which meant what is left is both paying rent and without some of the biggest long term assets so can't even take out loans based on the assets.How come none of these large companies seem to own the buildings they use? Wouldn't it make sense long term instead of renting them? Surely the monthly mortgage payments would be about the same.
Article I've just read says he owns a stake in Game, so potential for a merge.
If anything it looks like he's just streamlining businesses. Rather than have just house of fraser under one roof, you can buy your cds/dvds in one corner, your xbox/ps4 games in another corner, and the other corner can be reserved for your bargain sportswear.