Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
One thing I didn't realise is that since 22-28 nm ish, further shrinkage hasn't brought further cost savings for manufacturing. It's kind of been flatlining since then, at least until the processes are refined. I can't see it getting much better with 10, 7, 5 nm etc.
We've hit a bit of an economic limit as well as a thermal and clock speed limits.
So all we've got to look forward to for a while (with silicon based CPUs) is improved IPC and power efficiency for the money unless there are major architectural changes. Intel clearly have some headroom for higher clocks. I think it's going to be like the P4 days for a while where they just release CPUs with a clock speed bump and maybe extra cache and cores to remain competitive with, or ahead of AMD.
A potential change on the horizon is x86 compatible ARM chips. They're only forecast for portable devices at the moment but would be interesting to see another option in desktop space eventially. I'm not expecting much of a performance boost but you never know.
One thing I didn't realise is that since 22-28 nm ish, further shrinkage hasn't brought further cost savings for manufacturing. It's kind of been flatlining since then, at least until the processes are refined. I can't see it getting much better with 10, 7, 5 nm etc.
We've hit a bit of an economic limit as well as a thermal and clock speed limits.
I thought you could use Kaby in a Z170 board? If not thats crazy.
so yet again - a new intel chip wanting a new motherboard? and fans are loving this gravy train?
Kaby lake has had a poor reception from forum users etc.
Why do you come out with such crap about people loving this?
At least the Pentium G4560 looks great for the money and is only £32 to £33 per core with HT!
Just imagine how good it would have been a few years ago
In fairness that's not bad considering the comparable last gen i3 was over £100.At least the Pentium G4560 looks great for the money
Awesome considering the Pentium 4 HT was like £200+ per core ^^and is only £32 to £33 per core with HT!
not that much difference? you have to go back 10 years for a large swing in exchange rate ; 5 years ago it was £1 = $1.6
Raven Ridge will cover that end surely?
not that much difference? you have to go back 10 years for a large swing in exchange rate ; 5 years ago it was £1 = $1.6
I'd fogotten about Raven Ridge. Read some rumours of Zen cores (don't know how many) and PS4 grade graphis on an APU. That could fill the mid range nicely.
Yes, 4 cores is the minimum for Ryzen and their Zen "packages" are 4 cores each (meaning the 8 core is two "packages" together). The only way we'd see 2-3 core Ryzen is if they have significant yield issues.In fairness that's not bad considering the comparable last gen i3 was over £100.
Am I right in saying Zen isn't going to be coming in 2c4t though? Haven't been paying attention to the lower models but I thought 4c8t was the entry one?
Awesome considering the Pentium 4 HT was like £200+ per core ^^