String does match the pattern
Question to the home assistant massive…..
I have found out that the fox solar generation sensor within HA is a calculation based on pv power, due to the fact that fox OpenApi doesnt allow the actual solar generation sensor to be used, same as the export sensor.
Which has got me thinking, can a create two new sensors based of those onse and increase it by around the 12% that its under calculating or am i just speaking/thinking nonensense??
{{ (states('sensor.airing_cupboard_temperature_sensor_temperature')| float(0) * 1.12 | float(0)) | round(2) }}
do i put this code in config.yaml in the editor software??Templates are your friend here. Using the temperature sensor in my airing cupboard as an example:
Code:{{ (states('sensor.airing_cupboard_temperature_sensor_temperature')| float(0) * 1.12 | float(0)) | round(2) }}
It'll take the current temperature, multiple it by 1.12 (so that's your extra 12%) and round it to 2 decimal places.
do i put this code in config.yaml in the editor software??
template:
- sensor:
- name: "Internet Download"
state: "{{ (states('sensor.uxg_wan_in_stats')|float(0)*8/1024/1024)|round(2) }}"
unit_of_measurement: "Mbps"
- name: "Internet Upload"
state: "{{ (states('sensor.uxg_wan_out_stats')|float(0)*8/1024/1024)|round(2) }}"
unit_of_measurement: "Mbps"
type: gauge
entity: sensor.internet_download
name: " Download"
min: 0
max: 900
needle: true
severity:
green: 0
yellow: 750
red: 850
thats brilliant @the-evaluator i will take a look at these and try and get better data going forward, as i'm not happy with cloud data from Fox being so out of whackThere's a few ways you can use them, have a read of this.
I've got a few defined in configuration.yaml:
Code:template: - sensor: - name: "Internet Download" state: "{{ (states('sensor.uxg_wan_in_stats')|float(0)*8/1024/1024)|round(2) }}" unit_of_measurement: "Mbps" - name: "Internet Upload" state: "{{ (states('sensor.uxg_wan_out_stats')|float(0)*8/1024/1024)|round(2) }}" unit_of_measurement: "Mbps"
I can then call those sensors elsewhere. Such as:
Code:type: gauge entity: sensor.internet_download name: " Download" min: 0 max: 900 needle: true severity: green: 0 yellow: 750 red: 850
Which gives this:
If you're a Facebook user then then the 'Home Assistant UK Community' group is very useful. There's people there that know HA extremely well and are keen to help out.
You've basically bought consumer level gear that should work out of the box; so whilst HA "may" work in this scenario, it is definitely more at the expert end of the spectrum. Not saying it is impossible to use, or even difficult to use for a basic setup, but it feels like you were heading a "works and simple" direction and adding HA may make it overly complex.I've been pointed at Home Assistant and I don't know if it would be of any use to me or not.
My smart home is all Apple HomeKit and I also have a Pi running Homebridge which I use to interface my Ring Doorbell and my Pi-holes into HomeKit. The Ring integration isn't great, I don't get popups on the AppleTV when the doorbell rings (like it's supposed to) and the HomePods only sometimes make an alert when someone rings the bell.
The Pi-hole integration is great, I can say "Siri, disable pi-hole" or "Siri, enable pi-hole" and it works.
My Hue stuff goes through the Hue hub and into HomeKit.
Everything else talks direct to HomeKit. I have a couple of Taco smart plugs which I added to HomeKit by scanning the QR codes.
Would there be any benefit in switching to Home Assistant? Would the Ring stuff work properly and could I do the same with the Pi-holes?
Well the Ring stuff doesn't work as well as it should so if HA can fix that, it's something I'd be happy to switch over to. I don't have an issue with the 'expert end of the spectrum' at all.You've basically bought consumer level gear that should work out of the box; so whilst HA "may" work in this scenario, it is definitely more at the expert end of the spectrum. Not saying it is impossible to use, or even difficult to use for a basic setup, but it feels like you were heading a "works and simple" direction and adding HA may make it overly complex.
I have spare Pis, I wouldn't faff about with a VM.Bonus is you can just install it on your home PC and give it a go (via a Virtual Machine).
There's nothing stopping you having a go then - it is a great thing to tinker with. It could keep you busy for minutes or days. It sits "alongside" all your other gear, so you aren't making any irreversible/semi-permanent changes. A Pi will be fine to run it whilst you get familiar.Well the Ring stuff doesn't work as well as it should so if HA can fix that, it's something I'd be happy to switch over to. I don't have an issue with the 'expert end of the spectrum' at all.
I have spare Pis, I wouldn't faff about with a VM.
I've been pointed at Home Assistant and I don't know if it would be of any use to me or not.
Bit of both, getting Ring working properly would be a bonus.As the others have said, is there anything you want to do that's not possible with your HomeKit or do you want to see what HA offers?
I have some very complicated automations running in HomeKit.1) Are you finding limitations with what you currently have? HA is very flexible but that comes with a lot more time and effort for some of the more complex features. I have so many complex integrations and automations that are way beyond what each product and the the big name automation eco systems could achieve.
Not really.2) Do you want dashboards around the home?
I don't care whether the data goes off site or not. I suppose Ring may be a bit quicker if it's all done locally.3) Do you worry about privacy with your existing setup? I love being able to use voice commands and have that and all the automations work without my data and especially audio going off site. The only remote connection is a secure one for our devices to connect in to HA when away from home.
Excellent.The Pi-hole integration works pretty much the same, I say "Alexa, turn off the Pi-hole"
There's nothing stopping you having a go then - it is a great thing to tinker with. It could keep you busy for minutes or days. It sits "alongside" all your other gear, so you aren't making any irreversible/semi-permanent changes. A Pi will be fine to run it whilst you get familiar.
I don't know of anyone with Ring + HA combo although I'm sure they exist.
I think everyone here is getting rather tied up on smaller details without considering why you are considering HA.Bit of both, getting Ring working properly would be a bonus.
I have some very complicated automations running in HomeKit.
Not really.
I don't care whether the data goes off site or not. I suppose Ring may be a bit quicker if it's all done locally.
Excellent.
Does Reolink integrate with HomeKit?I think everyone here is getting rather tied up on smaller details without considering why you are considering HA.
Ring will never be full local in my understanding, it will always be cloud based.
I'm not sure HA is going to be the easiest way to solve your issue with the integration between Ring and AppleTV.
I'd wonder if chopping your Ring Doorbell out to something else may be the best way to solve your issues, if you decide to go to HomeAssistant at a later date, Reolink integrate well.
Only homebridge-camera-ui pluginDoes Reolink integrate with HomeKit?
I have an Apple TV I could experiment with; but I am not sure it does.