It makes more sense if you understand how IQ tests actually work.
You can't compare different countries and cultures with different tests for example.
Yay! I'm top of that list!
edit - actually not sure it it was the same test used across all countries or more of an observational study. Though there isn't much other data to suggest that these scores are particularly wrong.
A company I used to work for had a factory based in Angola. I can well believe those scores...edit - actually not sure it it was the same test used across all countries or more of an observational study. Though there isn't much other data to suggest that these scores are particularly wrong.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/s...-intelligence-is-a-fallacy-study-8425911.html
As an example. IQ tests just aren't reliable indicators of intelligence.
They aren't awful if you want an indication of what they are testing, and have a sample that have similar educational backgrounds, but otherwise really aren't great.
I'm not quite sure what your point is - no one has argued here that they're reliable indicators of intelligence.
LOL
had to google this:
https://iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country
the scores for some African countries are a bit
Two standard deviations below the mean is 'mental retardation' - for some African nations their average score is below that!
A company I used to work for had a factory based in Angola. I can well believe those scores...
So out of interest what are you and Dis suggesting below?
that sub saharan africans tend to have quite low IQ scores and that might go some way to explaining the dire state of plenty of sub saharan African countries
You were raised in HK?
But we just agreed that IQ has little to do with intelligence.
There are a lot of problems with many sub saharan nations (environment, geography, war, corruption and colonial legacy being some), but IQ and intelligence are unlikely to be two of those.
Half, I lived there for the first 11 years.
IQ is not 'intelligence', yes
that doesn't mean it is a completely useless thing to measure - there is correlation between IQ and earnings for example
What makes you say that?
If a rough indicator of the analytical ability of the general population is generally significantly low then this isn't a good thing. Sure, to be pedantic, the IQ score itself isn't the issue but what it is measuring quite likely is an issue.
There are plenty of things that could be affecting it - such as poor nutrition, a violent culture, early access to education etc...
There may be a correlation between earnings and IQ in the UK and west, but in Africa as well?
TBH you're probably most accurate with the education point. Lack of money for education is a major issue in many sub saharan nations, meaning many aren't educated to remotely good enough standards. "violent culture" is a bit of a stretch, yes, there is violence in war zones, but it's a rather large stretch to suggest most of those cultures are violent...
The whole question basically boils down to "what is intelligence". IQ tests a small facet of what we consider to be "intelligence" even in the west, but in places like sub saharan Africa Intelligence will likely be measured differently. That's why IQ is a problem and just doesn't work when comparing different cultures. The average IQ of an Angolan (as an example) would be 100 if the IQ test was set specifically for Angolans, as the average has to be 100.
it isn't a stretch at all tbh...
This has little to do with intelligence, again you're bringing up intelligence not me. IQ tests are a rough measure of analytical ability, if most of the population has very low scores then that does indicate a general problem.