My advice, I really wouldn't bother investing any more time trying to get "HDR" to work on this screen. This is a classic example of a screen advertised as being "HDR ready" and misleading consumers, when in fact it offers
no HDR benefits at all. At least they haven't slapped on the VESA DisplayHDR 400 badge, as far as i can see, to mislead people even further. The only slight HDR-related benefit is the ability to produce a higher peak brightness than some other screens (400 cd/m2 instead of the more common 300 - 350 cd/m2), but the same can be said for "SDR" content anyway. That has nothing to do with HDR really, and all you're doing is cranking up the screens brightness level and probably make it more uncomfortable. This screen is missing the necessary local dimming technology to actually improve the contrast ratio at all (i.e. to improve the dynamic range) so it's totally pointless. Fake HDR! There isn't even the easily-added wider gamut for improved colours that is often associated with HDR here, it's really in no way an HDR capable screen.
More information here which is probably worth a read:
Why Your HDR Monitor is (Probably) Not HDR at All – and Why DisplayHDR 400 Needs to Go