It's myoglobin, rather than blood.
(QI fact... blame them, if it's wrong!)
thats correct!
It's myoglobin, rather than blood.
(QI fact... blame them, if it's wrong!)
Typical french
I like it medium. Tried rare and just didn't enjoy it. Don't see what the appeal is, didn't have anywhere near as much flavour or as nice a texture imo.
Same, faintest strip of pink in the centre. Undercooked is a waste of good meat
As for the "blood" remarks, it's not blood.
I prefer the texture of the meat when it hasn't been over cooked and prefer the taste. You get the nice grilled taste on the surface, and the smooth silky rich flavour from the center. Perfect.![]()
I used to like it well done, until a restaurant i went to once took the pizzle by serving me charcoal, so medium to well done now. Just as long as it doesn't moo at me im good
MW would have a slight pink tinge inside, whereas WD woulod be grey throughout. IMO, you'll get variation across restaurants/people.What would the difference be between medium-well and well done?![]()
MW would have a slight pink tinge inside, whereas WD woulod be grey throughout. IMO, you'll get variation across restaurants/people.
Personally I always used to be a medium-rare person as that gives a lot of flavour from the cooked outside, whereas the inside is a silky smooth (as said above). However I've taken to eaten ribeye here and there and it really benefits from going more to a medium. Otherwise you end up with a lot of fat that's not rendered/cooked and it's really off-putting.
People who state 'walk it past the kitchen' are just being macho for the sake of it... in reality it entirely depends on the cut. The more fat it has the more it needs cooking for the optimum flavour. E.g. fillet can be nice and rare as there's no fat in it.