How is London affordable now?

Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,168
Croydon is horrific in places. I've had the displeasure of being on a tram where it's kicked off between rival groups of yoofs twice :eek:. Now I just get a taxi from the station to where I need to go when I have to visit.

Croydon is the only place I've had completely random people start on me in the street - quite a bit of Croydon is alright though. There is a band across that part of London through to St Mary's Cray that is a mismatch of nice areas and parts where you'd be stabbed for your shoes though.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
21 Feb 2006
Posts
29,326
London is a great city, I have never felt on edge or at risk there, ever, not once that I can recall, even when bombers were down the road or near where I am trying to kill people.

But I have also been to many of the worlds major cities, Paris, Rome, NYC, Chicago, Madrid, Berlin, Dudley and many more, so have some experience of what big cities are all over the place. I also don't find London dirty in most places because, well it's not. I see many people talk about it being dirty and dangerous after their 2 or 3 lifetime visits and I laugh. Now would I live there hell no, wouldn't for all the money in Stoke....perhaps Wolverhampton too....but I can see it's a great city and one of the world top cities for history, stuff to do, dining out, partying etc etc.

But I am a country bumpkin. Give me fields, quietness, nobody near me, silence in my garden but all within a 20 minute drive of civilisation and I am happy. I could not do the city, maybe 30 years ago but not these days. I enjoy working in the square mile, but I enjoy getting out of it more.
 
Soldato
Joined
30 Oct 2004
Posts
4,955
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
IT's not overpriced, it is priced at the commensurate rate of the area. It's no different to any other country - many capital cities are more expensive. It's just the way it is.

I would say that it is overpriced - although one generally earns more in London, the cost of housing is relatively higher than living in other UK cities. I apologise profusely for the Daily Mail link (and realise that it's from a couple of years ago), but London has the highest proportion of take-home salary spent on rent.

edit/ BBC link also has London areas as being the most expensive places to rent in a relative sense to salary.
 
Soldato
Joined
15 Nov 2005
Posts
2,948
Location
London
That city has really gone down hill in my eyes over the last few years. Vagrant central these days and because of the water restrictions impacting street cleaning, dirty and tatty.
Yea, it is (but im Currently in one of the less nice areas, moving soon). I heard from people here that it's actually gotten better, but even growing up in India, this was a real culture shock. London as someone else said, especially central like Soho or anything, wouldn't feel at all concerned even at 3 in the morning.
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Posts
58,912
Yea, it is (but im Currently in one of the less nice areas, moving soon). I heard from people here that it's actually gotten better, but even growing up in India, this was a real culture shock. London as someone else said, especially central like Soho or anything, wouldn't feel at all concerned even at 3 in the morning.

he was talking about San Francisco btw.. there is currently a rather big homeless problem over there - it's quite a liberal area, climate is nice and lots of people can't afford the rent any more thanks to tech companies and their employees taking over and pushing prices higher
 
Soldato
Joined
15 Nov 2005
Posts
2,948
Location
London
he was talking about San Francisco btw.. there is currently a rather big homeless problem over there - it's quite a liberal area, climate is nice and lots of people can't afford the rent any more thanks to tech companies and their employees taking over and pushing prices higher

I know. He was quoting me. I'm also talking about SF.
 
Thug
Soldato
Joined
4 Jan 2013
Posts
3,783
Lets remember what happened on 23rd June 2016.....that is no longer true.

This I don't. The British voted to regain their ability to influence their future.

Frankly I find it a bit eye raising this idea that because we don't want to be joined at the hip to other countries that we are somehow diminished. Feels very much like a particular political viewpoint of borderless states has worked on more than a few.....
 
Man of Honour
Joined
25 Oct 2002
Posts
31,745
Location
Hampshire
Somebody recently mentioned to me, that you can get somewhere in the Southwest for a lot less money, that's near a crossrail station - when it's complete it'll go direct to white chapel in like 40 minutes, which could be a pretty good alternative to physical moving to the city.

Crossrail doesn't go all that far south unfortunately, it basically goes out as far as Reading via Maidenhead / Slough etc so not much help for the real Southwest which is stuck with Waterloo rather than having a direct route into the city.
Also the ship has sailed to some extent, I think Slough registered the highest annual house price rise in the country fairly recently (~20%).

As for the main topic, I basically consider London unaffordable (or at least not personally justifiable) in terms of decent housing (i.e. family home in a reasonable area). I'm sure there's a few gems still to be had but apart from the very wealthy or those who have already got on the London property ladder and banked hundreds of thousand in appreciation it is difficult to find anything appealing. Even mediocre areas with relatively high crime you can still be talking over a million pounds for something livable and it would be really depressing spending that sort of money and finding yourself feeling uncomfortable in your own home.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
9 Dec 2014
Posts
1,298
Location
Hertfordshire
Lots of interesting reading here. I will have to agree, that for someone who has spent the vast majority of his time in London for the last ~5 years (but not lived there) I have never felt in danger. Don't get me wrong, there are areas of E or NE London I'd rather not walk down on a dark night by myself, but that's a normal thought to be having as a human being. As for central London, I have always felt safe there, even solo at 3am on a Saturday Night.

I've done a lot of property searching and I'm quite shocked at how expensive even the "worst" areas are. I can afford it, that's not the problem, I just feel it's exorbitant for what you get. The surprising thing is I can find a double room in a shared house with 5 others for £800 a month + bills, or I can pay £900 for my own 1 bed, no brainer what I'd rather do!

I'm still half tempted to move outwith the M25, not sure where, but the costs will be considerably more reasonable and so long as my commute is no more than 20-30 mins I'm okay with that. Luckily my work tends to either start at 5am, 11am or maybe 1pm depending on what shift I'm on, so I can avoid the worst of the 8-9am traffic. The only downside of living outside the M25 is I may loose out on the enjoyment of living in London socially, so it's a decision I'll have to make if I pay to have a great life or save a bit to enjoy life in a few years time.

Either way, paperwork is signed at work, I am 100% moving South, it's now just a case of deciding where to live.
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Nov 2002
Posts
3,495
Outside the M25 you're looking at closer to an hour door-to-door. Certainly if you're coming from the East/North of the M25 into the city. Longer if you have to cross London once the overground has spat you out.

Unless you're planning on driving in, in which case you've utterly lost the plot.

:)
 
Associate
OP
Joined
9 Dec 2014
Posts
1,298
Location
Hertfordshire
Outside the M25 you're looking at closer to an hour door-to-door. Certainly if you're coming from the East/North of the M25 into the city. Longer if you have to cross London once the overground has spat you out.

Unless you're planning on driving in, in which case you've utterly lost the plot.

:)

I work at City Airport, so London isn't really London as in London, if you see what o mean
 
Caporegime
Joined
30 Jun 2007
Posts
68,784
Location
Wales
Yet we spend over £5bn abroad on holidays. So we must want something from the rest of the world.

And similarly we have 100s of thousands moving away.


We just like slumming it :p

London though is far cleaner and nicer than Rome or Paris.

both are a lot more run down and rome is horrific for all the ***** trying to sell stuff to you/beggars.

i think it helps that for most of London the buildings are either brick, or Portland stone. not plastered like they are on the continent, pealing/flaking plaster looks terrible quickly but brick and stone look good unless something major happens.
 
Back
Top Bottom