Given that it is a 'respect' language I would disagree....Not to mention that each character has various pronunciations, in some cases dozens...added to that the need to marry this up within two separate syllabaries and the inconsistancy of the rules regarding the structure and even native speakers complain of difficulty in understanding the messy grammar system.
It is not as straight forward as Chinese in grammar, although pronunciation in Chinese is all about tone and inflection which makes it far more difficult in that regard.
However, the point is that you claim Japanese is much simpler than English, and this simply is not supported lingustically, especially grammatically.
Sure, if you wanted to, for example, work in Japan you would need to learn the honourific form amongst others which complicates thing but generally the short and long forms would see you through just fine. I meant pronounciation in relation, to say Chinese (as you mentioned), not in the fact that there could be several different ways to pronounce a symbol. Combining these with the Japanese symbol sets I would argue actual makes the language a hell of a lot easier. It is easier to differentiate between verbs/adjectives etc. All languages have their grammatical compexities (English being one of the worst), but in basic terms the grammatical structure is largely unchanging. For example normally the subject and verb are found in the sentence-initial and sentence-final positions, respectively. When you start to use ellipsis though obviously this changes, but I'd still argue it is easier than a lot of English sentence structure, especially as slang works its way in to most levels of conversation (unlike Japanese).
Tell that to my girlfriend when she was learning English!
Yes, on the surface that's what my post said, but it was aimed towards arrogant English speakers. I have heard many people say that everyone should learn English just because it is "better", and this is simply not true. Yes, it the predominant language for business and that is why most people learn it, but that doesn't mean it's better. Many English people hold the view that foreigners coming in to our country should make an effort to speak the language, so why would it be any different for us going abroad? I genuinely get embarrassed when I see an English person abroad making no effort at all.
Also, so what if someone only ends up speaking a language to a non-fluent level? Does that mean they shouldn't bother trying to better themselves? When I lived in Japan if I didn't work my ass off studying the language I wouldn't have got anywhere or done anything. Why would I rob myself of the privilege of exploring such a wonderful country? And re the museum thing, I don't really see your point, "less words"? If you're trying to say English is a simple language, it isn't. I could argue that Japanese is much simpler, in that everything has to be in very explicit terms.
Given that it is a 'respect' language I would disagree....Not to mention that each character has various pronunciations, in some cases dozens...added to that the need to marry this up within two separate syllabaries and the inconsistancy of the rules regarding the structure and even native speakers complain of difficulty in understanding the messy grammar system.
So why not just say English people who work and live abroad should make an attempt to fit in including learning the language. However, that is completely different to what your post said. If you are going to go on a rant then at least make the rant specific to what you are having a good moan about.
And I didn't say English was a simple language I said it was an efficient language for conveying a message in the minimum amount of words. Surely you can see how this is beneficial and maybe an aspect of it's universal appeal.
Japanese is certainly not simpler than English, at least not from a lingustic perspective.
Quite the opposite.
I can say a few things in German after being in Austria for while.