Going frim a 192HP car to an 89HP car for a few months was crap
each to their own, i went from 187hp to 50hp and thought it was great fun, okay it was an old swift so light and nimble with steel wheels, but it was fun on any road under 70mph and did more overtaking than you would imagine and safe overtakes aswell, stepping up to a 67hp 107 was nice and still as fun and did all the same as the swift but was better on motorways, for a 1ltr city car, it sure had no problem me dropping to 3rd at like 50mph to overtake in slow traffic, pulled surprisingly well.
but with that said, it nice to have gone from a 70hp 113lbs/ft 1.4hdi in a 307 that was my previous car to my petrol 1.6 118hp 118lbs/ft pug 2008, so much quicker and as fun to drive(i actually found a 1.6 petrol 307 rubbish too ironically), so easy to drive at 30-35mph in 5th even round tight back road bends. i look at performance/mpg/tax/insurance/practicality and i tend to try find that ideal balance, oh and purchase price, i couldve had a new mazda 3 2ltr petrol thats quicker, better mpg, £30 tax and probably no difference on insurance, but were costing like £2k more than what my pug cost, so was out of reach, same with leon FR models.
my car history and power differences goes as followed: been driving 14yrs
metro 1.1 60hp(1st car) > punto 1.2 60hp > mk6 fiesta 1.25 75hp > MGF 1.8 118hp > puma powered mk5 fiesta ZS 127hp > mk2 mondeo 1.8 125hp > punto 1.2 60hp > corolla T sport 1.8 187hp > 02 suzuki swift 1ltr 50hp > pug 107 1ltr 67hp > pug 307 1.4hdi 70hp > pug 2008 1.6 118hp
with a mix of 90hp/155lbs/ft - 147-187hp/280lbs/ft depending what Evoque my mums partner has and had as they will have been the more powerful/torque diesels over the years