if you have a DDR5 board then a 14700k would have been a good upgrade but DDR4 dose make a differance in games so you would need a new board and ram too... in that case the only real option is AM5
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
How often do you upgrade your CPU and Motherboard
- Thread starter cosmogenesis
- Start date
if you have a DDR5 board then a 14700k would have been a good upgrade but DDR4 dose make a differance in games so you would need a new board and ram too... in that case the only real option is AM5
Seems your a kid.
Old cpus are an issue for many.
You may think they perform fine but they simply dont today.
You find that from people that dont use amd x3d technology chips as gaming is on a whole new level with amd technology.
2 years is the upgrade path.
and once you go oled and x3d cpu you wont buy anything else.
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2006
- Posts
- 7,251
- Location
- London
YOU'RE
DON'T
WON'T
LMFAO - calling me a kid.
PC's are not for gaming only - GET with the program
well yes and no.
it all depends on your use case. if you PC pays your bills a 5 years old CPU could literally be costing you time and money.
in video encoding and 9900x would be about 40% faster then your 5900x, if you work 10 hr's a day thats a massive gain in productively
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2006
- Posts
- 7,251
- Location
- London
Yes and no to your comment too My 10+ year old PC draws way less power than any modern PC but I do agree it all depends on use case.
If gaming and a 20% gain in FPS year in year out then I understand that scenario but for sensible, responsible people they would pass on such meagre gains
i have made some silly CPU choices in the last 18 months, but if just for gaming id say your right. but i would also say to most now the none X3D AM4 chips are classed as old and intel 14th gen / ryzen 7000/9000 give a very big gain in fps and 1% lows, however going from a 14900k or 7800x3d to a 9800x3d for just games is a silly move.
lets talk your system 5900x and a 3070 is still and ok system, but adding a 5700x3d @1080p would give you a very big gain in FPS but also the 1% lows, you said your son as a 240hz monitor, your would feel a night and day differance.
and thats just spending £150 and you would probably get £90 back for your cpu. i feel £60 is a good investment.
Last edited:
i think you would be shocked, my 7800x3d before i killed it would game at about 70w, the 5700c3d about 60w your 5900x would pull around 80w in game(5900x at 1080p more due to the added cpu load)
your 3070 will pull around 220w in an average gaming situation, a 4070s is around 180w again in an average gaming situation
unless your buying the tippy top of gaming parts like 4090's power draw is not really all the bad
Every 5 years, but I last brought my mate's i7 6700k and upgraded last week to a Ryzen 9800X3D
I find it's too much cost to upgrade CPU and GPU at same time, so just need to upgrade my GPU from a 6800XT, to maybe series 4 or 5 Nvidia GPUs
I find it's too much cost to upgrade CPU and GPU at same time, so just need to upgrade my GPU from a 6800XT, to maybe series 4 or 5 Nvidia GPUs
Caporegime
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2008
- Posts
- 25,236
- Location
- Lorville - Hurston
You high?
The motherboard I wanted finally came available from an alternative retailer today so I pulled the trigger on the 9800X3D, Mobo and some DDR5 RAM. Collecting the CPU and mobo from the store (Its free to get it delivered to the store but a tenner to get it delivered to the house).
all depends. i would think you can still haply game on a 9900k and or 3700x, probably even older.
but if you want to drive high frame rates, 12700k and or 5700x/3d
if you buying a 5090 and want max setting 7800x3d and or 13700k or newer
BUT there is a massive amount of variables in there you could game on older
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 16 Oct 2003
- Posts
- 630
- Location
- West Sussex
Still running a threadripper 2950x & x399 from 2108.
Was doing fine with an RTX4090 but decided to get a 5090 and now having issues with it not booting unless pcie gen 2 is selected in bios so I’m now looking to upgrade to 9800x3d & X870e.
I would have probably kept this setup longer if it wasn’t for the issue, it’s been rock solid.
Was doing fine with an RTX4090 but decided to get a 5090 and now having issues with it not booting unless pcie gen 2 is selected in bios so I’m now looking to upgrade to 9800x3d & X870e.
I would have probably kept this setup longer if it wasn’t for the issue, it’s been rock solid.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2008
- Posts
- 25,236
- Location
- Lorville - Hurston
Your 4090 would have been bottleneck by your thread ripper.
Why get 9800x3d? Get 9950x3d. Assuming you still do productive work on your pc?
Associate
- Joined
- 16 Oct 2003
- Posts
- 630
- Location
- West Sussex
Yes it was slightly bottlenecked but at least it worked. The 5090 refuses unless pcie gen2 speeds are set.
I don’t actually use it as much for productivity any more like I used to, more gaming, hence the choice of the 9800x3d. If the 9950x3d was released already this may be a different choice.