Alright so I tried to take into account how some solar generation might impact the different tariffs based on todays rates.
Global settings:
- 0.7kWH per hour house demand on average
- Daily home consumption of 16.8kWh (24 * 0.7kW)
- 8.2kWh battery
- 2.4kW max charge/discharge
Assumptions:
- Battery is always charged off-peak as far as the max charge rate will allow in the off-peak window
- Flux battery is held at a certain SOC % until it can discharge some units later on (in my case probably 75% would do).
- Flux export price for additional exported units is always standard rate not the best peak rate beyond the initial 5.1kWH exported
- Flux avoids using import in the most expensive peak window
- Go and Eco7 both just hold the battery at 100% until end of off-peak window, then allow battery to power the home
- All 3 tariff options first use excess solar to lessen the cost of peak rates, and then export only if that count is met.
- No accounting for round trip losses still.
The table:
Summary:
Once again just highlighting what I already knew. Flux gets better the more you generate. the 20kWh isn't the excess generation beyond usage figure, that is 20kWh generated total. It's also not miles worse even if you only generate a little.
8kWh generation is about the time all 3 start getting very equal, by 10 it's the best option.
Eco7 is actually pretty competitive unless you have an EV or way more battery storage, but lacks the generation payments.
Illustration of how the figures are calculated at 20kWh:
(Regular Cost) - (Peak Units negated) - (Exported Units)
Flux = ([Regular cost] £4.25) - ([Peak Units negated] 12.6 * £0.3423) - ([Exported Units] 7.4 * £0.2439)
£4.25 - £4.313 - £1.804 = £1.87
For Go and Eco7, the Peak Units Negated caps out at the same value as the Imported Peak units (5.8 and 3.7 respectively) and after that all go to export.
Think I'm done with my calc stuff don't want to spend more time on it!