HUNGARORING - BUDAPEST - HUNGARY Grand Prix 2009 - Race 10/17
- Thread starter Glaucus
- Start date
yes that is your strange opinion. What does that achieve. The danger has passed the wheel is already off. Have you ever watched racing before.
lets think about that shall we. I'm not the one coming out with silly opinions that has never been the case in racing. The danger is he wheel falling of. SO why retire after it's come of. You stance makes no sense at all
A slow car of teh racing line. Which happens in many situations for many reasons. A car scrapping along is no problem at all. It's only the skid pan, what do you expect to happen.
As for a lose wheel if you watch racing then you know it does not happen. You get back to the pits and carry on.
As for a lose wheel if you watch racing then you know it does not happen. You get back to the pits and carry on.
The FIA is absolutely retarded giving Renault any penalty. As far as I can remember no penalty has been given for lose wheel nuts resulting the wheel coming off. Change the rules and make the teams aware of them. Before punishing something that used to be fine. Totally ridiculous.
When has a similar punishment ever been made for a lose wheel nut and there has been many even in recent years.
Were the other incidences like that though?
Seeing as we've had wheels full of at the end of the pit lane before.
but that requires rule changes or the FIA to say we will use existing rules more than we used to. Until then, teams have no choice but to continue to do what they have always done before. It doesn't matter if he is out the points. They have sponsors to keep happy and data on the car to be collected. Especially with no testing. Which means they have a very good reason to carry on.
What. Plenty of cars have gone on to finish a race after having three wheels. After all the only likely damage is the skid pan.
So no it's not as stupid as you make out.
Are you suggesting that someone should only ever be penalised for breaking a safety rule if someone else has been penalised previously? How does that work exactly
yes, unless the FIA clarify it.
Don't you think it is ridiculous that the FIA pull rules out that they haven't enforced before with no warning. (that might not be the case here due to the wheel aeros being a give away). It sets a president and this is why so many of us are annoyed with the FIA. They are not consistent both with incidents and what the punishment received is.
Well if you didn't notice that's what I asked about a few posts ago. If this situation was different to many other similar incedients. To which the reply seemed to be yes, due to the aero being a give away.
However I can't remember the exact surroundings on previous lose nuts, as they were non incidents apart from being embarrassing and it would be interesting to see a comparison between them.
Under current rules they can't perfect kers. IMO. f1 needs a massive rule change to include any type of fuel source. If companies want to devlop an electric car that is faster, let them.
Just have limits say on fuel weight. Be it liquid,gas,electric or whatever.
just like brawn did?
It would be very similar. I imagine it would be cheaper for BMW to sale than just to pack up.
But anyway, there's more than enough cars for a 20+ grid without running 3 cars.