My bad - it just came across that waySic said:i never inferred even for a second that she did.
I think you need to get some information rather than relying on supposition.dirtydog said:Sure, because they realise they're riding a deathtrap and the slightest most innocuous accident even at low speed could very easily result in death or serious injury.
That is ridiculous! Would you argue that if someone pulled out in front of your car because they didn't see you, that you should have been driving a Transit because a car is harder to spot?dirtydog said:I think it's a bit simplistic to blame car drivers for not seeing bikes, when bikes are hard to spot.
Hmm, not sure on this one. Plenty in what sense? As a proportion, most ride with their lights on 24/7 simply because it makes you more visible. Around dusk I see many cars who haven't realised(?) that the streetlights are starting to come on - proportionally more than the number of bikes I see with no lights on.dirtydog said:I've also seen plenty of bikes without their headlight on, even in dim light, which seems suicidal to me.
Treefrog said:That is ridiculous! Would you argue that if someone pulled out in front of your car because they didn't see you, that you should have been driving a Transit because a car is harder to spot?
No matter who you are or what you're driving, it's your responsibility to make sure it's safe to execute a manouevre. If you find it difficult to see a smaller vehicle then make sure that it's safe
Hmm, not sure on this one. Plenty in what sense? As a proportion, most ride with their lights on 24/7 simply because it makes you more visible. Around dusk I see many cars who haven't realised(?) that the streetlights are starting to come on - proportionally more than the number of bikes I see with no lights on.
And a Transit is bigger than a car and thus easier to spot. Not sure where you're going with this?dirtydog said:No because a car is bigger than a bike.
Thank you - you're doing more than most.dirtydog said:I do try to do just that.. but I'm only human.
Abso-bloomin'-lutely! And then drive round with just their fogs on when it's a clear night.dirtydog said:I don't disagree, in fact it is one of my pet hates about driving that probably 50-75% of drivers do not put their HEADLIGHTS on in dim light, or fog.. they either drive with no lights, or side lights. I mean for the love of god, what use is side lights..
Again, so much would depend on the situation. I lost the front end on black ice once, slid for about 100' on my arse and had only a wet patch to show for it.dirtydog said:If you lose control due to a slippery road, chances are you will be seriously hurt.
I cant help wondering; if you didn't see the bike because it was dark and the rider was wearing dark clothes (I assume this means he blended into the background?), why are you confident that you would see a dark car?Zip said:If this was a car i would have seen it so much easier and sooner, well before i even arrived to the corner i would have spotted the car but the bike and the rider just blended in.(he was wearing dark colours and was riding a dark bike with no head light so that could have something to do with it)
This doesn't mean im blind and i can see most things clearly when i'm driving, it just means in some situations its harder to see a bike in places where you would see a car no matter how hard you look![]()