We would both rather spend money on him than ourselves.
146k over 18 years including child care, 82k without child care.
That makes it a more realistic sort of figure.
But what they must include is the average spend for things like, changing the colour of their bedroom everytime they've gone off having a stupidly bright colour, or replacing their school pants after every time they've played football.![]()
Our son cost us £12k in the first 6 months.
Now he's costing around : £1500 a month at the age of 2 years (+ Birthday and Xmas presents)
Monthly breakdown
- Nursery : £1,250
- Food and Drinks : £40
- Clothes : £40
- Toys : £60
- Days out : £40
£690 child care a month for 2.5 days a week, FML it's such a rip off, he loves it and mrs can work a bit, going back full time would be pointless for her as the cost of childcare would cancel out the increase in pay, that's what's so silly, it doesn't pay for us to both work full time
Should have put it as : Toys/books/DVD's/Magazines£60 on toys a MONTH! What a spoilt child
[DOD]Asprilla;24792993 said:Childcare costs will take up Mrs A's entire salary for a while, but it does mean that her career is not on hold and we'll be much better off once the kids are in school.
Should have put it as : Toys/books/DVD's/Magazines
Then your missing out on a big part of life.
Best thing that ever happened to me.
Depends on what's important, paying for someone else to bring up your child until they go to school and not putting career on hold, or forget career and concentrate on being a parent, is that what you're saying?
Still that's ridiculous for a 2 year old!
What a stupid thing to say. Using childcare isn't paying someone else to bring your child.![]()
Well it is in a way you are beholden to the way those people raise your child in your absence. They certainly will not do everything the way you would do it and that will be a problem at times and a godsend at others. I get what you are saying - it doesn't mean you are removing the responsibility from yourself however at the end of the day those people will be providing the environment that will partially, to a greater or lesser extent, shape your child.
studies suggest otherwise........
Kids cost us way more than that but that was our choice to have one parent stay at home. Often these figures calculate the removal of the second wage in which case ours cost us a good 150k per year.
Depends how you do it and how you quantify it. We all have different thresholds for what we can and do give our kids. I know I spend a good grand a year just on my lads football most likely two grand when you add in all the travel costs and he is only 5. But then that is my choice and I see spending money on anything that improves the body or the mind as desirable and healthy. Other people however will see that as extravagant but then won't think a second by getting them a iPad etc. That however is not something I would do.
What I am saying is I can see how you could arrive at those figures quite easily.