• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

I9 9900k

Robert896r1 said:
My 9900k is stable at 5ghz 1.26v but can't do 5.1ghz @ 1.3v :(
Click to expand...
You are in the same boat as me :p, even at 1.4v then instant BSOD. Not to worry at least it is a nice round number at 5ghz.

Here is also my Cinebench run with CPU at 5.0ghz, memory at 4000mhz and cache at 4.3ghz. Will be working on ocing the memory a little if possible and taking the cache up a little more if possible over next few days when i have time. Might also see if i can get a few cores to 5.1ghz at 1.3v. See if i can get over 2200 points.

Overall very happy with the chip, very quick.

qbv7bpL.png
 
scaper28 said:
which board would you guys say is better for single gpu and 2 x 8gb mem and i9-9900k , Asus XI Gene or Asus XI Xtreme ?
Click to expand...
The Gene is a good board, be it mATX, the Extreme is a EATX, which I am using at the moment is the Flagship XI Z390 board. So will depend on what you are going to be doing with the kit really. And the £120 difference in price of coarse.
 
moorhen2 said:
The Gene is a good board, be it mATX, the Extreme is a EATX, which I am using at the moment is the Flagship XI Z390 board. So will depend on what you are going to be doing with the kit really. And the £120 difference in price of coarse.
Click to expand...


I have the extreme at the moment but I was debating to sell it to my brother and buy the Gene , I don't like the EATX size and as I am using just 1 x EVGA 2080TI FTW3 and 2 x GB 4600Mem I thought the gene may be better for overclocking , looking on the 3dmark HOF lots of the top scores all seem to be using the Gene board . but tbh I am not sure either way
 
scaper28 said:
I have the extreme at the moment but I was debating to sell it to my brother and buy the Gene , I don't like the EATX size and as I am using just 1 x EVGA 2080TI FTW3 and 2 x GB 4600Mem I thought the gene may be better for overclocking , looking on the 3dmark HOF lots of the top scores all seem to be using the Gene board . but tbh I am not sure either way
Click to expand...

The Gene is a good overall board I must say. But the Extreme is built with overclocking in mind.
 
tyler_jrb said:
You are in the same boat as me :p, even at 1.4v then instant BSOD. Not to worry at least it is a nice round number at 5ghz.

Here is also my Cinebench run with CPU at 5.0ghz, memory at 4000mhz and cache at 4.3ghz. Will be working on ocing the memory a little if possible and taking the cache up a little more if possible over next few days when i have time. Might also see if i can get a few cores to 5.1ghz at 1.3v. See if i can get over 2200 points.

Overall very happy with the chip, very quick.

qbv7bpL.png
Click to expand...
Have you tried going down the AI overclocking route, should give you a good indication of your chips capability. Have a look at this, might help.

In step 2 I would run Realbench for a minimum of 15 minutes.

67e83c99-70ea-4f44-b6fb-aea56362b915-original.jpg
 
scaper28 said:
Most of the HOF scores seem to have the Gene , however I am only watercooling and not using LN2 or anything so my wonder was being 1 GPU and 2 mem sticks would the gene be better suited for me
Click to expand...
Its a choice only you can make, but like you say, you only have two sticks of ram, so a two dim slot board would be ideal. Or wait for the Apex, like I am. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom