You have to have UAC on for protected mode to work.
Why are you made to feel like a lepper if you say "I like IE7"?
I have tried Firefox several times and have allways reverted back to IE7.
People will flame me, but IE7 is more than adequate for what I need from a browser at the moment.
nothing wrong with ie7 and I would probably be using it. But it does not have the quick launch bar.
Do you? Well UAC kind of annoyed me so it got disabled. More secure yes, but I don't feel I need it.
Eh?Jesus...
Do you all have strengthened bullet proof glass windows on your house as well?
Good to hear then. But you'll be amazed at the number of people on this forum that just disable UAC "because they heard it was crap" and don't really know the implications of disabling it.I'm not blindly disabling it, I'm well aware of the "risks" I know you can run as admin but I just didn't feel the need for it. I'm not stupid when I'm online I run a firewall, do regular malware scans.
I didn't say it wasn't secure. It *is* *very* secure. But only in the right hands. Linux is a right PITA to keep secure because it doesn't really have an integrated update system like Windows Update. It require a lot of hand holding to keep it patched up to date and hence secure. The other problem with Linux security on the desktop is that it tends to very much be a case of "through obscurity". It is a similar strategy that Apple seems to have adopted with Mac OSX which many of their customers have bought into. "If no one is targetting it then it doesn't matter how many vulnerabilities the OS has!"And as for Linux not being secure? Well the majority of malware is written for Windows. And I don't really see myself being hacked or suffering DoS attacks. I can't really see anyone with an in depth knowledge of Linux looking to cause trouble targeting me.