<smug>Pudney@work said:Accelerating is changing speed
Phnom_Penh said:<smug>
No it isn't. Its change in velocity.
</smug>
You've kind of answered what I said, acceleration is change in velocity. Not speed.Pudney@work said:Velocity is the combination of speed and direction, a change in either constituent would create a form of acceleration.
Phnom_Penh said:And acceleration = (V - U)/T.
V-U = delta V.Visage said:No, thats AVERAGE acceleration.
Acceleration = dv/dt, where v is a vector.
b (thats it) said:I've thought about it a bit (not nessicarily with the headlights on) and came to the (i'm sure completly wrong) conclusion that the car would become invisible due to it going faster than the light bouncing off of it, to observers in front, and you would end up with a "light boom" in a cone shape behind the car, simular to a sonic boom. All those victim to this "light boom" would be blinded by it and possibly incinerated.
Completly wrong i'm sure but its a hell of a lot of fun to think about![]()
Phnom_Penh said:V-U = delta V.
Phnom_Penh said:And acceleration = (V - U)/T.
You've kind of answered what I said, acceleration is change in velocity. Not speed.
With your nose touching 2 walls. As my old maths teacher like to tell the stupid kidsVisage said:Utterly wrong. Go and stand in the corner.
lol, I only do Alevel physicsVisage said:For non-zero delta t, yes. If delta T is not tending towards zero then you're rtalking about average acceleration, since it is measured over a period of time, as i said.
Von Smallhausen said:1.21 GIGAWATTS !!!!!!!!
/belittles, mocks, laughs, lampoons and points.Borris said:1.21 jigawatts of electricity.
hendrix said:
You set 'em up, I'll knock 'em down.Oracle said:Flying Pigs