If I said to you...

quick thoughts:

you can tell the truth about being a liar.... but that truth is solely about accepting that you are a lier, and the lie is another entity altogether:unrelated..... And so, telling the truth means nothing... And to add salt to the wounds of lieing, 'now i have lied about being a lier' refers to the previous 'i am not a lier' and so this whole scenario is not such as bigger deal as it seems. .... since the lie in question, is of little significance :confused::D
 
Reworded the OP to remove the ambiguity. At one point I thought somebody was going to enter their boxing stance over the wording.
 
I'll get the popcorn ready then :D

Yes, I can't wait, if he thinks I lie (*) he must have the most dullest life ever - a candidate for nobody knowing who he is when he wins the Lottery :)


* I don't doubt I get things wrong
eg I once said on here that I saw Led Zeppelin at Earls Court twice in 1976 and they called me out as being a liar because it was 1975 :)
 
It's not a paradox. The world does not blow up when I say it.

As others have said, you can simply be selective about when you lie.
 
I do not think the example given of the liar's paradox in the OP has been understood. What if it was presented in the form of:

"This sentence is false"

There is no sometimes, selectiveness, occasionally etc to be had in this instance.
 
I do not think the example given of the liar's paradox in the OP has been understood. What if it was presented in the form of:

"This sentence is false"

There is no sometimes, selectiveness, occasionally etc to be had in this instance.

But that's not referring to something real so isn't a paradox. It isn't incongruous with it's existence. It just makes no sense.

See if you can phrase it as a real world example, like a hypothetical person the OP was trying to do.
 
Back
Top Bottom