'Illegal immigrant' could be deported...

Permabanned
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
47,396
Location
Essex
A woman of 80 who has lived here since she was aged two :rolleyes:

Pensioner in deportation threat

An 80-year-old woman who moved to Scotland from America in 1929 has been told she could be deported as an illegal immigrant.
Marguerite Grimmond was born in Detroit but moved to Arbroath with her Scottish mother when she was two.

At the beginning of May she left Scotland for the first time for a holiday in Australia.

But when she returned, officials said her American passport was not valid and that she could not stay in the country.

The immigration officers said Mrs Grimmond, who had never applied for British citizenship, should have had her passport stamped by the Home Office before she set off on her holiday.

They told her she would only be able to stay in Scotland for a further four weeks, after which time she was legally required to return to America.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/tayside_and_central/6756341.stm

If only the muppets in charge of immigration were as zealous about deporting real illegal immigrants and failed asylum seekers. Is common sense not a part of the job description?
 
If only the muppets in charge of immigration were as zealous about deporting real illegal immigrants and failed asylum seekers. Is common sense not a part of the job description?

No,

This is why the statue of justice holds a sword, some scales and is blindfolded.
 
Whilst she should really have applied for citizenship, thats an absolutely ridiculous waste of time, money and effort that needs to be expended elsewhere.
 
Rathanes said:
Yet you supported the VC-winning Ghurka being kept out of the UK? :confused:
Erm spot the difference. This lady has lived here for 78 years and has a Scottish mother. The Ghurka has never lived here and does not have British parentage.
 
Sounds a bit silly if you ask me but then shes not very bright is she??...i mean coming over here at the age of 2 and not applying for british citizenship is quite simply silly tbh.

Sorry but she only has herself to blame for this...
 
dirtydog said:
Erm spot the difference. This lady has lived here for 78 years and has a Scottish mother. The Ghurka has never lived here and does not have British parentage.

No but he did risk his life for Queen and Country.
 
Alchemy said:
Quite right they are.
:confused:

seaviewuk said:
There was a case like this a couple of years back.

It won't happen.
I'm (quite) sure you're right but it should have all been sorted out quickly with a bit of common sense - why should law-abiding citizens have to suffer this nonsense, especially ones of advanced years where it could cause undue stress and worry, or worse.
 
Spawn said:
Sounds a bit silly if you ask me but then shes not very bright is she??...i mean coming over here at the age of 2 and not applying for british citizenship is quite simply silly tbh.

Sorry but she only has herself to blame for this...

I take it that is tongue in cheek!
 
Spawn said:
Sounds a bit silly if you ask me but then shes not very bright is she??...i mean coming over here at the age of 2 and not applying for british citizenship is quite simply silly tbh.

Sorry but she only has herself to blame for this...
Perhaps her British mother didn't realise it was necessary. You certainly can't hold the two year old responsible for not doing it, I don't suppose two year olds are too up on immigration policy :rolleyes:
 
Slinwagh said:
No but he did risk his life for Queen and Country.
Don't get me started on that again ;) Seriously, don't please - at least not in this thread :) If you want to revisit that debate (not that I want to) there is an existing thread on the topic which is better suited.
 
platypus said:
Whilst she should really have applied for citizenship, thats an absolutely ridiculous waste of time, money and effort that needs to be expended elsewhere.

Does she need to though ? It says she has a scottish mother so I thought she had automatic British nationality .

Or is this something to do with americans not being able to hold 2 nationalties? In which case as she has obviously made her choice by choosing American nationality and having a US passport, why should she be treated any different to any other immigrant/temporary visitor to the UK ?

EDIT - I assume US passport regulations are somewhat similar to ours in that passports don't last forever so I would guess she would have had to re-apply for one within the last 10 or so years - if she wanted to be British its not like she's not had long enough to do something about it .

If she wants to be the national of a foreign country why should she be exempt from UK laws ?
 
dirtydog said:
:confused:


I'm (quite) sure you're right but it should have all been sorted out quickly with a bit of common sense - why should law-abiding citizens have to suffer this nonsense, especially ones of advanced years where it could cause undue stress and worry, or worse.


Indeed.

No doubt done some Scotch lickspittle jobsworth offical with nowt better to do.
 
dirtydog said:
Perhaps her British mother didn't realise it was necessary. You certainly can't hold the two year old responsible for not doing it, I don't suppose two year olds are too up on immigration policy :rolleyes:

whooooosh
 
Kipper67 said:
EDIT - I assume US passport regulations are somewhat similar to ours in that passports don't last forever so I would guess she would have had to re-apply for one within the last 10 or so years - if she wanted to be British its not like she's not had long enough to do something about it .

If she wants to be the national of a foreign country why should she be exempt from UK laws ?
I'm not sure about the US to be honest, since 9/11 their passport regulations have been changed so many times.
 
Back
Top Bottom