Im lost for words....

fatiain · 16 Oct 2006 at 18:40

ElRazur said:
Originally, i posted the thread because the convict killed someone who refused his sexual advances (bear in my the victim's age and that of the killer.)

So what don't you understand about it?

Al Vallario · 16 Oct 2006 at 18:41

ElRazur said:
I wasnt talking about the pleasure bit i was talking about the boy killing another boy because of refusing sexual advances....

It's simple. Kid A is sexually interested in Kid B. Kid B wants none of it, so Kid A murders him.

ElRazur · 16 Oct 2006 at 18:42

fatiain said:
So what don't you understand about it?

I would expect that kind of crime in someone older than that and not the victim and killer both underage so to speak.

fatiain · 16 Oct 2006 at 18:43

ElRazur said:
I would expect that kind of crime in someone older than that and not the victim and killer both underage so to speak.

Read my first reply. Nothing surprises me any more.

Zip · 16 Oct 2006 at 18:43

ElRazur said:
I would expect that kind of crime in someone older than that and not the victim and killer both underage so to speak.

Down here awhile back we had 2 boys aged around 9 or 10 kid nap a 3 year old kid from a Supermarket and Shuve double A Batterys up his arse then bashed him to death and left him on some train lines where he was later found

Kids can be just as crawl if not even more so

Tru · 16 Oct 2006 at 18:44

Zip said:
Down here awhile back we had 2 boys aged around 9 or 10 kid nap a 3 year old kid from a Supermarket and Shuve double A Batterys up his arse then bashed him to death and left him on some train lines where he was later found

Kids can be just as crawl if not even more so

Actually that was 'up here' and the kid was James Bulger.

Zip · 16 Oct 2006 at 18:45

Tru said:
Actually that was 'up here' and the kid was James Bulger.

How odd, I wonder if one case coppied the other after hearing about it on TV? :confused:

Tru · 16 Oct 2006 at 18:46

Zip said:
How odd, I wonder if one case coppied the other after hearing about it on TV?

If you could find a news source we would be in a much better position.

ElRazur · 16 Oct 2006 at 18:47

Zip said:
Kids can be just as crawl if not even more so

But i was once a kid and i never thought of doing things like that...perhaps the world has "advance" since my time...

Al Vallario · 16 Oct 2006 at 18:47

Tru said:
If you could find a news source we would be in a much better position.

Wikipedia: James Bulger

The "batteries in the rectum" claim is a myth, but the murder was still absolutely horrific. He was only two years old, too

Zip · 16 Oct 2006 at 18:48

Tru said:
If you could find a news source we would be in a much better position.

Its an old one and im not sure what to look up but ill give it a go.

Ill be back with my results soon

Edit: Anyone got any idea where to start looking?

cleanbluesky · 16 Oct 2006 at 18:50

"Give guns to the queers..."

egt · 16 Oct 2006 at 18:51

He'll probably get his wrist slapped with a light sentence, let out early, name changed and relocated to another part of the country for his protection at the tax payers expense.

Great system we have

Tru · 16 Oct 2006 at 18:55

Zip said:
Its an old one and im not sure what to look up but ill give it a go.

Ill be back with my results soon

Edit: Anyone got any idea where to start looking?

I searched for "james bulger" copycat australia and it came up the name of a killer by the name of Dante Arthurs, who raped and murdered a girl in Australia this year. Cue rumous that it was one of the Bulger killers who been relocated to Australia.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=393024&in_page_id=1770

Fantom · 16 Oct 2006 at 19:09

******* **** :mad:

Zip · 16 Oct 2006 at 19:29

Tru said:
I searched for "james bulger" copycat australia and it came up the name of a killer by the name of Dante Arthurs, who raped and murdered a girl in Australia this year. Cue rumous that it was one of the Bulger killers who been relocated to Australia.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=393024&in_page_id=1770

That could be the one, We must have been told what happend over there and then got told that they were being sent here.

I cant remember all the detailes because back then i didnt really take much notice of anything other then wehats happening in my own life

B@Th*nG · 16 Oct 2006 at 19:38

fatiain said:
It's a legal term. Being detained at Her Majesties pleasure - locked up in one of her prisons.

isn't at detained until she see's fit to release him? hence at her pleasure? although it's not her who deals with the precident it is still at her majesties law enforcers "pleasure". pleasure isn't a sexual word, why people are assuming it so is beyond me.

B@Th*nG

Tru · 16 Oct 2006 at 19:40

Zip said:
That could be the one, We must have been told what happend over there and then got told that they were being sent here.

I cant remember all the detailes because back then i didnt really take much notice of anything other then wehats happening in my own life

They were relocated within the UK so I think you've got the wrong end of the stick entirely.

Zip · 16 Oct 2006 at 19:42

Tru said:
They were relocated within the UK so I think you've got the wrong end of the stick entirely.

In that case then it might have happend down here.

Im confused now

MoNkeE · 16 Oct 2006 at 19:43

egt said:
He'll probably get his wrist slapped with a light sentence, let out early, name changed and relocated to another part of the country for his protection at the tax payers expense.

Great system we have

Read the ****ing link before you make comments :rolleyes:

-RaZ