Bro, the incel movement is not a benign support group, though that's how it started many years ago. Nor is 'Incel' just a pejorative for a singleton. It's a borderline extremist club of angry males, riding each other up and harassing women for the crime of not ******* them.
but can't say I get much **** for it, sure I've no doubt been turned down in favor of someone taller but if that's what the person wants, who's to blame them? I've met women who didn't mind or even liked the fact I was not towering over them, everyone's got their own deal, I think if you grow bitter at some rejection then you're setting yourself up to fall. Also other than a couple of my male friends who use the women on there I literally know 0 people who use Tinder to do anything but troll. I have no clue where the women who use Tinder are, they're either super secretive about it or don't get out much.
Incels DO develop in a vacuum, that's the point. it's a total vacuum of outside or off-message opinion. Incubating extremism.
They were some statistics generated from OKCupid, they had a large sample size but i can't remember how they generated the data for it. I believe what they actually found was that women found 80% of men to be below average attractiveness. Men did not exhibit the same behaviour and they found womens attractiveness to be more of a bell curve with most women around average attractiveness and an increasingly small amount of outliers when approaching either end of the scale
Most research into online dating indicates this. Women generally rate average looking guys as 2 or 3 out of 10.
Cute soundbite, but it doesn't even mean anything.
That the guys in this thread talking about butter faces and hobbits are barking up the wrong tree. These dudes aren't failing to get laid because of physical attributes, but rather that they can't express an attractive personality, or demonstrate the sort of competence that is attractive.
I don't think people consign themselves to defeat purely because of looks anyhow.
Yup. Agreed.
