Indonesia Executions

I would hazard a guess that drunk drivers kill many more than Class A substances, so they ought to be executed.

(Don't misinterpret me, it is a heinous crime but not deserving of a death penalty)

No.

Drink Drive Deaths in UK 2013 was 290

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23529736

Deaths due to Heroin, Methadone, Morphine,Cocaine and Amphetamines total over 1000 for the same year (see table 6a for breakdown per substance)

Heroin and Morphine 765
Methadone 429
Cocaine 169
Amphetamine 56
MDMA/Ecstasy 43

http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm:77-375474

If you add drug related crime deaths to that I think you will find total deaths from or directly related to drugs will far exceed drink drive killings.


The other interesting stat on table 6a is the fact that 62 people died from Helium poisoning in 2013 in the UK !!! WTF :eek:
 
The other interesting stat on table 6a is the fact that 62 people died from Helium poisoning in 2013 in the UK !!! WTF :eek:

You can die in two ways I believe - first is if you inhale Helium in its compressed form directly from the pressurised canister, can't remember why this kills you - think it's something to do with forming bubbles in your blood. The other way is that you can't actually breathe Helium, when you inhale it just sits there in your lungs not doing anything because it's inert - so if you aren't careful you suffocate yourself.
 
No.

Drink Drive Deaths in UK 2013 was 290

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23529736

Deaths due to Heroin, Methadone, Morphine,Cocaine and Amphetamines total over 1000 for the same year (see table 6a for breakdown per substance)



http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm:77-375474

If you add drug related crime deaths to that I think you will find total deaths from or directly related to drugs will far exceed drink drive killings.

So if you take away the illegality and regulate, those numbers will dramatically reduce no?

Edit : That's a very interesting read with some very surprising figures . Thanks for posting.

Edit 2 : Alcohol kills more teenagers than all other drugs combined. It is a factor in the three leading causes of death among 15- to 24-year-olds: accidents, homicides and suicides.

Taken from :http://www.drugfreeworld.org/drugfacts/alcohol/international-statistics.html
 
Last edited:
So if you take away the illegality and regulate, those numbers will dramatically reduce no?

Edit : That's a very interesting read with some very surprising figures . Thanks for posting.

Edit 2 : Alcohol kills more teenagers than all other drugs combined. It is a factor in the three leading causes of death among 15- to 24-year-olds: accidents, homicides and suicides.

Taken from :http://www.drugfreeworld.org/drugfacts/alcohol/international-statistics.html

Methadone is regulated and still kills people. Alcohol is regulated and still kills a lot of people. Tobacco is regulated and kills loads of people.

I don't get where this assertion comes from that legalising something somehow makes it safe and gets rid of any problems to do with it.
Look at just how much crime is associated with drunken behaviour!
 
Methadone is regulated and still kills people. Alcohol is regulated and still kills a lot of people. Tobacco is regulated and kills loads of people.

I don't get where this assertion comes from that legalising something somehow makes it safe and gets rid of any problems to do with it.
Look at just how much crime is associated with drunken behavior!
Are you suggesting we ban alcohol or make it fair and legalise drugs?

I think you can gather the killing point from my post!

Regulation makes it safer with less crime, i suggest you read the documents provided in my original and the quoted post.
 
Last edited:
^^ Spot another dope smoker :p

Execution for something more illegal than tobacco and alcohol ;)

Wrong, and I think that punishments should be administered according to severity and harm caused. He would have caused extremely low amounts; in no way proportionate to a death sentence however you look at it.
 
No.

Drink Drive Deaths in UK 2013 was 290

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23529736

Deaths due to Heroin, Methadone, Morphine,Cocaine and Amphetamines total over 1000 for the same year (see table 6a for breakdown per substance)



http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm:77-375474

If you add drug related crime deaths to that I think you will find total deaths from or directly related to drugs will far exceed drink drive killings.


The other interesting stat on table 6a is the fact that 62 people died from Helium poisoning in 2013 in the UK !!! WTF :eek:

Can't view it in detail on my phone, but are those not total numbers from 1993 to 2013? E; dw no, just managed to get it to load.

Also drunk driving is only one specific example of an alcohol related crime/death.
 
Last edited:
Are you suggesting we ban alcohol or make it fair and legalise drugs?

I think you can gather the killing point from my post!

Regulation makes it safer with less crime, i suggest you read the documents provided in my original and the quoted post.

I suggest you calm down and smoke a pineapple! I was neither agreeing nor disagreeing with you. I was making a statement.
If we went idealist I'd say a blanket ban on mind altering substances is the solution. Either that or a ban on idiots.
 
I suggest you calm down and smoke a pineapple! I was neither agreeing nor disagreeing with you. I was making a statement.
If we went idealist I'd say a blanket ban on mind altering substances is the solution. Either that or a ban on idiots.

We'll have to ban Tea and Nutmegs then.

Isn't it weird that you could have a room full of Cactus with Mescaline inside them but substitute the Cactus for some Cannabis plants then you're a criminal?
 
We'll have to ban Tea and Nutmegs then.

Isn't it weird that you could have a room full of Cactus with Mescaline inside them but substitute the Cactus for some Cannabis plants then you're a criminal?

Then so be it. Like I said, blanket. It would be the only way. However as I said before that's an idealists solution and this isn't an ideal world.
 
Then there should be no death penalty as you can never by 100% certain, without any doubt, that a person is guilty of a crime.

eh?

are you saying that if someone ran through the streets of london on a saturday afternoon, stood in front of a cctv camera, shot someone in the head, waited for all the police and cameramen from sky news to come and said on live TV "Hey, I did it, I'm guilty" you can't be 100% sure :confused:

I'm sorry, but I don't agree with you

There are cases where you can be 100%, unless you want to debate physics with me (but this aint the right forum for that lol)

The only way I could agree with your statement, is if the person responsible for the shooting was a time traveller from the future and was able to instantly teleport (using technology from the future) and swap places with his twin brother. I guess as highly unlikely as that would be, I guess you can't be 100% so yeah, kinda agree with you
 
Last edited:
I suggest you calm down and smoke a pineapple! I was neither agreeing nor disagreeing with you. I was making a statement.
If we went idealist I'd say a blanket ban on mind altering substances is the solution. Either that or a ban on idiots.

Sorry bud, I didn't mean it to come across like that, my only excuse is I was at work:o

Its a debate that will go on forever, I just think the whole argument on drugs is hypocritical from all points.

Edit : I gave up the pineapples;)
 
Sorry bud, I didn't mean it to come across like that, my only excuse is I was at work:o

Its a debate that will go on forever, I just think the whole argument on drugs is hypocritical from all points.

Edit : I gave up the pineapples;)

I totally agree it's hypocritical. That's the big problem with it really. We have harmful substances that are totally legal and illegal substances that are less harmful. It's nuts.
Hell, you only have to look at the fact that a few years ago most of the government's own advisory body on drugs quit because of the hypocrisy!
 
Any that support the killing of another being, especially on something like this is frankly weird in my book.

Its a brutal punishment that is not fititng the crime. Then again, I don't agree with executing people full stop.
 
Back
Top Bottom