I'd respect them if they pulled 6 games out the hat at random and Intel were faster in 4 games while AMD were faster in only 2. That would be better for marketing surely?
A cherry-picked selection like this where they're the fastest means absolutely nothing.
Essentially this is what they did. on the bottom slide...
The left side of the slide Intel admit losing in 6 out of 30 games, in the main part on the right Intel have 24 games, highlighted in yellow they claim, rightfully i'm sure, they win by >3% in 13 of them while the games that are not highlighted they say they are on parr, that's 11 games.
That slide is actually pretty honest and reasonable, if it was not for the choice in CPU's to make the "Budget choice" claim. AMD win 6, on par 11, lose 13.
The top one they just picked the 6 games they have the biggest margins they could find and published that, this is much more Ryan Shrout... Off the top of my head there are a couple of games where AMD could do exactly the same thing with the 3900XT vs the 10900K and rightfully claim the 3900XT is 15% faster.
@~>Dg<~ get a grip.