• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285k 'Arrow Lake' Discussion/News ("15th gen") on LGA-1851

For me, Cinebench tells me 95% of the info I need to know about a CPU, single/multi performance and power/heat under load. Games generally run fine on any modern CPU's as dev's don't want to release a game that needs a top end CPU(would hurt sales). I think, an out-of-the-box review would be interesting, everything stock, no BIOS changes. I never buy top-end RAM and all reviews use it which gives results only a very small user base will ever get, most user don't know what XMP/EXPO is.
 
Picked up these interesting comments floating about from Robert Hallock.....

"Intel's Robert Hallock has confirmed that Intel's Core Ultra 200S series launch did not go as planned."

"According to Hallock, Arrow Lake's performance from third-party reviewers did not align with what Intel saw in its internal testing. Hallock noted a massive disconnect between third-party review performance and Intel's internal testing."

Oh, look....

 
Last edited:
Picked up these interesting comments floating about from Robert Hallock.....

"Intel's Robert Hallock has confirmed that Intel's Core Ultra 200S series launch did not go as planned."

"According to Hallock, Arrow Lake's performance from third-party reviewers did not align with what Intel saw in its internal testing. Hallock noted a massive disconnect between third-party review performance and Intel's internal testing."
Oh, look....


He could have said “we have horrible testing procedures”. Although my guess is they weren’t given enough time to test. This should not happen.
 
Back
Top Bottom