• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Intel has a Pretty Big Problem..

So you have nothing then, I'll continue this discussion when you bring something of substance which backs up your claims.

Honestly at this point you should take it up with Intel because your theory could save them a fortune. Meanwhile back on planet earth the facts are well established over these issue. Issues nearly ended Intel, cost its CEO his position and seen payments to firms to move to AMD.
 
Issues nearly ended Intel, cost its CEO his position and seen payments to firms to move to AMD.

Nope, as has previously been established in these threads those issues started long before these 13th and 14th gen issues and they aren't remotely of a scale, even if as bad as you claim, to cause Intel's woes of late a lot of which is due to failures of its foundry businesses and strategic missteps in mobile and AI segments.
 
Nope, as has previously been established in these threads those issues started long before these 13th and 14th gen issues and they aren't remotely of a scale, even if as bad as you claim, to cause Intel's woes of late a lot of which is due to failures of its foundry businesses and strategic missteps in mobile and AI segments.

The mobile chips are also starting to fail in same way. This issue will get worse over time for Intel. Nvidia might have cough up another 5 billion.
 
The mobile chips are also starting to fail in same way.

There has never been any difference between the desktop and mobile parts using the same architecture in this way - there have been a small number of 13900HX, etc. failing consistent with the desktop parts.
 
There has never been any difference between the desktop and mobile parts using the same architecture in this way - there have been a small number of 13900HX, etc. failing consistent with the desktop parts.

You must not have been fallowing the failures at all. The mobile failure rate was around 2% 16ish moths ago and it’s around 4% now, which goes against every known MTFB profile. Right now that figure should be close to zero as all the early failures should have happened, it to mention laptops being complete OEM systems, that figure is almost certainly skewed.
 
You must not have been fallowing the failures at all. The mobile failure rate was around 2% 16ish moths ago and it’s around 4% now, which goes against every known MTFB profile. Right now that figure should be close to zero as all the early failures should have happened, it to mention laptops being complete OEM systems, that figure is almost certainly skewed.

Yet if we went with your version they'd be 50+% failures - as a lot of the mobile parts like the 13900HX, etc. are basically desktop chips. So finally we get to the reality of around 3% failures.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G J
Yet if we went with your version they'd be 50+% failures - as a lot of the mobile parts like the 13900HX, etc. are basically desktop chips. So finally we get to the reality of around 3% failures.

More projection.

That’s what the available data sets showed at the time. Now that figure looks more like 16-30% failure rate. However, as I said that figure will and is increasing over time.
 
Back
Top Bottom