Where is the contradiction? as I said I don't have access to Intel's return data but I have enough insight into some retailer's returns data to have an idea of the scale of the problem - it would certainly show up there if it was remotely close to the 20, 50, 100% failure rates some claim.
I also pointed out that the claims in the media made by certain parties of ridiculously high failure rates weren't able to be verified by the likes of GN while we have claims by a substantial source who have a verifiable industry presence which are likely more accurate.
No idea what you are referring to with the "You even double down and claimed to data that shown AMD had an issue." comment.
There are no facts I'm arguing against - I've even repeatedly linked to facts which don't support the claims you keep referring to.
You either have the data to backup the argument or you don’t. Which is it?
Show the data or stopping trying to debunk established facts that Intels 14/14 gen failures are ridiculous and the platform is crap.
 
	 
  
 
		