• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Intel has a Pretty Big Problem..

Where is the contradiction? as I said I don't have access to Intel's return data but I have enough insight into some retailer's returns data to have an idea of the scale of the problem - it would certainly show up there if it was remotely close to the 20, 50, 100% failure rates some claim.

I also pointed out that the claims in the media made by certain parties of ridiculously high failure rates weren't able to be verified by the likes of GN while we have claims by a substantial source who have a verifiable industry presence which are likely more accurate.

No idea what you are referring to with the "You even double down and claimed to data that shown AMD had an issue." comment.

There are no facts I'm arguing against - I've even repeatedly linked to facts which don't support the claims you keep referring to.

You either have the data to backup the argument or you don’t. Which is it?

Show the data or stopping trying to debunk established facts that Intels 14/14 gen failures are ridiculous and the platform is crap.
 
You either have the data to backup the argument or you don’t. Which is it?

Show the data or stopping trying to debunk established facts that Intels 14/14 gen failures are ridiculous and the platform is crap.

I've shown plenty of data in this and previous threads which is sufficient to disprove your position, not my problem if you won't take it in.
 
I've shown plenty of data in this and previous threads which is sufficient to disprove your position, not my problem if you won't take it in.

You keep saying that, but the facts remain… Are you going to backup your claims and provide the evidence you claim to have or not? I’m being to think you might actually have some, but it also proves the severity of the 13/14th gen issues.
 
You keep saying that, but the facts remain… Are you going to backup your claims and provide the evidence you claim to have or not? I’m being to think you might actually have some, but it also proves the severity of the 13/14th gen issues.

The RAD Games information alone shows the real scale of the issue in comparison to your claims, the rest is just denial on your part.

We can keep going around this but it doesn't change that you can't provide a single verified piece of information to support your claims and I have provided plenty of substantial information that shows otherwise.
 
Last edited:
The RAD Games information alone shows the real scale of the issue in comparison to your claims, the rest is just denial on your part.

We can keep going around this but it doesn't change that you can't provide a single verified piece of information to support your claims and I have provided plenty of substantial information that shows otherwise.

Talk about projection and cope.

Show the data you claimed bebunks the issue.

 
Someone enjoys their 13600k, and jigger urinates his pants, foaming at the mouth.
Classic OcUK CPU section.

It’s not foaming here, Rroff wanted to go another magical mystery tour. I told a user not to pat 13600k too hard or it might fail because probability is harsh mistress. The poor chap then went to tell how great his chip is…

 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom