Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2003
- Posts
- 30,063
- Location
- In a house
..and this is where it will all end in tears, regardless of how powerful the card is.
Yeah just like AMD.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
..and this is where it will all end in tears, regardless of how powerful the card is.
So it sounds like the Samsung 8nm process is having issues with failure rates with 35 out of 79 ?
Nv are also staying at Samsung for Ampere replacement (whether on 8nm or the new 7nm remains to be seen) - TSMC have no capacity at 7, 7+ or 5 at all. You can bet Nv are leaning on Samsung to improve yields (which is surprising that 8nm isnt so good - its a mature process, 14nm>12nm (at glofo)>10nm>8nm all LPP) whereas 7nm will be EUV.
That's fully working dies though, which the yield calculators don't really emphasis enough.For Nvidia (on samsung 8nm), the numbers play out as 35 working dies from 79 on a wafer (or so) for GA102 - but Samsung are charging $7k a wafer rather than $10K from tsmc - this info is from 4 months ago though