Brum Man said:Avoid a footballers knot at all costs.
It's a really, really big knot.Mohinder said:What's a footballer's knot? A windsor knot?
Lagz said:The question is. . . do you really want to work for a company that wont emply you because your suit isn't up to scratch? Unless they are idiots they will see straight through your presentation if you are not good enough for the job. . .
There's more than one way to look at that, though.Lagz said:The question is. . . do you really want to work for a company that wont emply you because your suit isn't up to scratch? Unless they are idiots they will see straight through your presentation if you are not good enough for the job. . .
Definitely. That's what I'd expect in an interview to be honest, I think it's quite right an employer would turn someone down because they looked scruffy or like they couldn't be bothered in their interview. Maybe you shouldn't judge a book by its cover, but in an interview situation that's not true at all. It's up the prospective employee to present himself in a way that promotes him - makes him appear the best for the job. The look is part of that.Sequoia said:The other way is that I've rejected candidates at interview because they've shown up looking scruffy, or even just a bit worn round the edges. If someone can't be bothered to make the effort for an interview, what does it say about their likely dress standards for work and even their general attitude? Now, maybe that means you'd not want to work for me, but if so and if dress standards aren't important to you, then at least we have a mutual agreement .... because I wouldn't want you either. On the other hand, if you want the job ......
Arcade Fire said:It's a really, really big knot.
Windsor knot is the way to go, I think. The 'school tie' knot just looks amateur!
Yup. A sharp suit isn't going to be enough to get someone a job. They have to demonstrate much more than that. But not making the effort for an interview might be enough to lose them the job (assuming there were other suitable candidates). Why go for a job if you aren't bothered enough about it to be prepared to maximise your chances?Mohinder said:.... It's up the prospective employee to present himself in a way that promotes him - makes him appear the best for the job. The look is part of that.
phykell said:If you can afford it get a decent suit, a white or blue 100% cotton shirt and a decent silk tie that isn't too garish. Wear black leather shoes and cotton socks, a reasonable hair cut and clean-shaven. Don't listen to anyone who says you should wear the latest "fashionable" colours because generally speaking, the people who will be interviewing you are probably not going to be impressed as they almost invariably will be older and less concerned if not completely ignorant of the latest fashion.
Fixed for the non metrosExorcist said:nothing right with fake tan on blokes,
Lagz said:The question is. . . do you really want to work for a company that wont emply you because your suit isn't up to scratch? Unless they are idiots they will see straight through your presentation if you are not good enough for the job. . .
dilated said:for £100 you can get a very nice designer suite if you look around.
Mohinder said:That's all well and good, but I've never been asked to provide my on seat at an interview.
dilated said:if you are going to be pedantic about spelling and typos, then please get your own house in order first. nothing worse than a smart arse