Wear a KKK outfit - that's perfectly acceptable![]()
Saw some idiot in Torquay one halloween night once wearing that.
Wear a KKK outfit - that's perfectly acceptable![]()
How many black people alive today in Britain have suffered any of those things?

Having worked as a part-time youth worker for nearly 7 years I have had to deal with multiple situations ranging from racist graffiti, 15 year old skinheads singing white supremacists songs in the club, regular casual racism and the worst one was having to break up a fight where a bunch of these young racists had set upon a black kid outside the youth club!
Sadly bigotry is still well alive and kicking![]()

Plenty of black people are still persecuted today, you only need to look at these very forums to see that pathetic racists still exist!
And even sadder than that it's fairly rife among our youth![]()
Having worked as a part-time youth worker for nearly 7 years I have had to deal with multiple situations ranging from racist graffiti, 15 year old skinheads singing white supremacists songs in the club, regular casual racism and the worst one was having to break up a fight where a bunch of these young racists had set upon a black kid outside the youth club!
Sadly bigotry is still well alive and kicking![]()
Yes we should.
Its perfectly natural to divide people based on genetic differences.
Someone has red hair.
Someone has blue eyes.
Someone has curly hair.
Someone is black.
Someone is female.
Its a genetic subset. Genetics are not offensive. People thinking others are being oppressed by describing them accurately is incredible mupperty in action.
Now saying uneducated young black men are all theives, thats racist.
Using mackup to darken your skintone so you look more like MrT in a fancy dress party, no, that isn't racist.
Referring to someone having black skin because they have black coloured skin, no, thats not racist.
[..] You go ahead and refer to everyone as the same, very dull world you live in, everyone has to be the same and described as the same, I prefer a bit of varaition in my life.
I hope the guy who doesn't like grouping people never has to describe someone when they didn't know their name "erm yes, I'm looking for a human, have you seem them around?"
It's kept you in a job![]()


Do you really think that "black man" is a more accurate description of that person's appearance? Seriously?

I'm another person like that. I've often had to describe a person's appearance.
So I describe their appearance. I don't lie about it to fit some silly grouping that isn't real.
It's not difficult, e.g. "Tall guy, looks about mid 20s, medium brown skin, really short black hair, wearing jeans and a white T-shirt".
Do you really think that "black man" is a more accurate description of that person's appearance? Seriously?
Meh, i totally disagree with that, just putting people in boxes to suit your shortcomings really. That's what the cliquey media/fashion people like to do.
You obviously don't know much about history and the oppression of various peoples around the world. Periods of oppressing are often followed by periods of protection.
There's a big flaw in your argument - "black" and "white" are not an accurate description of appearance. It's a false division based on inaccurate descriptions, so your otherwise valid argument doesn't apply. Human skin colour is a spectrum, not two discrete groups. Not many people have black skin and hardly anyone has white skin. Arguably no-one, because a person with albinism will have slightly pink skin due to blood. But the key point is that "black" and "white" creates and reinforces an artificial division. It is not simply an accurate description of appearance.
I'm another person like that. I've often had to describe a person's appearance.
So I describe their appearance. I don't lie about it to fit some silly grouping that isn't real.
It's not difficult, e.g. "Tall guy, looks about mid 20s, medium brown skin, really short black hair, wearing jeans and a white T-shirt".
Do you really think that "black man" is a more accurate description of that person's appearance? Seriously?

Do you know what adjectives are?
What, like the Irish slave trade? Or the holocaust? At some time or another every race has been oppressed, identifying someone by a feature that they have (i.e. being white, black, asian etc.) isn't racist and it's idiotic to think it is.
Whilst not technically accurate they clearly have a defined meaning within the context of race. If someone says white then you know it means that they're of European descent.
Medium brown? That could mean anything from Indian to Iranian, hell I could fall into that when I have a tan. Saying black clearly defines them as having African ancestry.
You come across as a narrow minded person who loves to stereotype. In an ideal world we would all be humans. We don't need to characteristic people on their looks. This is not crimewatch.