Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I say G-Sync is dead. Freesync won![]()
For those with G-sync monitors they can take some comfort that their investment is not on the decline. Just shows you though that Nvidia never do things out of the goodness of their heart but also AMD wont anything to combat these sorts of tactics either
i think you give the average joe too much credit as it can also be interpreted as nvidia only lolAll that marketing these monitors as G-sync compatible does is let everyone know it has decent support for Adaptive-Sync. It tells everyone that, regardless of the brand of GPU we use the monitor's a good choice, Yes regular bods may not realise that but if they do a little research it's simple enough to figure out & if they're looking to buy in they should be smart enough to want to confirm what they're buying into.
In my case it was not a waste as when buying it as it was the only way to have a much bigger range at 4K. The LG freesync I had before was only 40-60. Also you got things like overdrive etc. Plus a gpu that could deliver playable fps at 4K on the latest games like FFXV which was not AMD at the time. Lol.
The point it I won 3 years continuous arguing about this, which proves how Nvidia was fleecing those buying G-sync (with module) monitors.
Surprised no one has mentioned this...
Nvidia are market leaders in GPU's in fact they own around 70% of the market, as opposed to AMD at 30%.
So it makes sense for the monitor manufacturers to label them as Nvidia certified as opposed to AMD certified. This way they appeal to a much larger audience, thus helping them increase sales..
Having the G-Sync logo on there is not the problem. The problem is removing all the Freesync branding. Why are both logo's not on there, the only reason i can think is pressure from Nvidia to remove it or money changed hands. With both logo's you appeal to 100% of the discrete market as apposed to 70% or 30%.
After watching the video I have a look at websites for these monitor in his video and I found that the manufactures website still listed Freesync and I also found UK Rainforest still said Freesync while the USA site didn't. So its not like all the monitors have had Freesync removed completely! Also, Nvidia do not support Freesync 2 monitors only Freesync 1
Least that is what I have found so far "Correct me?" Freesync 2 is AMD cert and monitors must meet a spec to be listed Freesync 2 compatible from HDR to LFC
Surprised no one has mentioned this...
Nvidia are market leaders in GPU's in fact they own around 70% of the market, as opposed to AMD at 30%.
So it makes sense for the monitor manufacturers to label them as Nvidia certified as opposed to AMD certified. This way they appeal to a much larger audience, thus helping them increase sales..
Surprised no one has mentioned this...
Nvidia are market leaders in GPU's in fact they own around 70% of the market, as opposed to AMD at 30%.
So it makes sense for the monitor manufacturers to label them as Nvidia certified as opposed to AMD certified. This way they appeal to a much larger audience, thus helping them increase sales..