ISIL, ISIS, Daesh discussion thread.

Harlequin said:
did you watch the UN observers report? the UN report counters everything you have said
Click to expand...

The links I provided counter everything you've said. In fact they show you completely made it up.

Here's another one for you

"Voting only took place in government-controlled territories, meaning those displaced by fighting or living in rebel-held areas were unable to take part."

"The vote excluded regime opponents from running"

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middl...ead-polls-farcical-vote-2014632482229680.html
 
Last edited:
Dis86 said:
The links I provided counter everything you've said. In fact they show you completely made it up.

Here's another one for you

"Voting only took place in government-controlled territories, meaning those displaced by fighting or living in rebel-held areas were unable to take part."

"The vote excluded regime opponents from running"

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middl...ead-polls-farcical-vote-2014632482229680.html
Click to expand...

so the video above , which btw is the UN themselves , delivering the report on the election , that they sent observers to.

but you link a tv station news report.... wow are you really that ****ing stupid
 
Harlequin said:
so the video above , which btw is the UN themselves , delivering the report on the election , that they sent observers to.

but you link a tv station news report.... wow are you really that ****ing stupid
Click to expand...

The first link...was the head of the UN...
 
Dis86 said:
The first link...was the head of the UN...
Click to expand...

you have linked nothing except a post from aljazeera , which btw is based in Qatar - a country which is funding ISIS (allegedly) , whereas the actual UN report into the election has been posted above
 
Harlequin said:
i think you had better tell the independent observers then , that you - a keyboard warrior knows more than they did - and they were in country
Click to expand...

Still curious why you think a German would be less able to comment on Syrian elections?

And I shall take your lack of any response to the actual argument as telling: can't explain why the results show clear signs of being made-up, huh?
 
Jokester said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-38369962

Looking like it's increasingly kicking off in Turkey then.
Click to expand...

A lone wolf attack, nothing more. Sad for him and his family, no-one deserves to be murdered in cold blood like that.

I highly doubt this will cause Russia to increase any hostilities though. There's no reason for it to. Turkey have dealt with the attacker, I presume by killing him. I'm sure that will placate Putin sufficiently. After all, even Putin must realise that incidents like this are a likely fall out from his actions in Syria.
 
Harlequin said:
another idiot who is arguing against the UN themselves - go and watch the actual UN video , of the actual report on the election.
Click to expand...

You seem unaware of what the UN actually is, and how it works. This is nothing more than a vote of approval from a series of similarly dubious countries.

Can you explain how it is that the supposed raw number of votes shows every sign of being ineptly back-calculated from the given percentages?

quite simply that is why a german should not comment on this - you are arguing against the UN themselves.
Click to expand...

Again with your non sequiturs. What does whether or not I'm German have to do with what arguments I make, or who I argue with?
 
robfosters said:
I highly doubt this will cause Russia to increase any hostilities though. There's no reason for it to. Turkey have dealt with the attacker, I presume by killing him. I'm sure that will placate Putin sufficiently. After all, even Putin must realise that incidents like this are a likely fall out from his actions in Syria.
Click to expand...

Quite. Russia would rather have Turkey as an ally sticking a thumb in the eye of the West than start a war with a country it has no interest in.
 
Mr Jack said:
There have never been free and fair elections in Syria. It is not a democracy.
Click to expand...
You may want to mention this to the independant observers then as they will probably be shocked to find out that what they saw was some kind of illusion/mirage XD


Dis86 said:
Except as has already been shown they weren't independent. They were lead by Syrias allies.
Click to expand...
That hasn't been shown, it was claimed by you then refuted. Brazil, Canada, USA, etc are not Syrian allies, of the 32 countries that the observers came from only a few were from countries allied with Syria.

If you would like I can link a video of five of the US observers reporting to the UN?


Dis86 said:
"Voting only took place in government-controlled territories, meaning those displaced by fighting or living in rebel-held areas were unable to take part."
Click to expand...
Well thankfully we already know that's twaddle as not only was the voting nationwide but it was also conducted abroad so that those displaced by the rebels/ISIS could vote via the local embassy (unless blocked from doing so like in the USA).


Dis86 said:
"The vote excluded regime opponents from running"
Click to expand...
So the guy who ran against Assad in the presidential election, who was from another party opposed to Assad's was not a regime opponent? The 83/250 parliamentary seats that went to nominees who weren't allied with the Baath party coalition (the reigning government) AKA "the opposition" did not go to opponents of the regime?

Next you will be saying that Jeremy Corbyn works for the Tories XD
 
Last edited:
ubersonic said:
You may want to mention this to the independant observers then as they will probably be shocked to find out that what they saw was some kind of illusion/mirage XD



That hasn't been shown, it was claimed by you then refuted. Brazil, Canada, USA, etc are not Syrian allies, of the 32 countries that the observers came from only a few were from countries allied with Syria.

If you would like I can link a video of five of the US observers reporting to the UN?



Well thankfully we already know that's twaddle as not only was the voting nationwide but it was also conducted abroad so that those displaced by the rebels/ISIS could vote via the local embassy (unless blocked from doing so like in the USA).



So the guy who ran against Assad in the presidential election, who was from another party opposed to Assad's was not a regime opponent? The 83/250 parliamentary seats that went to nominees who weren't allied with the Baath party coalition (the reigning government) AKA "the opposition" did not go to opponents of the regime?

Next you will be saying that Jeremy Corbyn works for the Tories XD
Click to expand...

Uber you seem to be another one that's incapable of reading. Sad :( Suggest you read my quotes that you've put there and try replying again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom